"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government."
- George Washington
"Some of you would bitch if a hot blonde served you a perfect steak and beer of choice while naked and performed acts not described." Mark5pt56
I think the 'tunnel' effect is always possible, simply because you are looking down a long tube vice a short RDS housing.
But compared to other LPVs, the PST Gen 2 1-6 is very easy to use and I don't notice the tube at all unless my head gets waaay out of position. It's very forgiving.
ETA I have limited time behind a Razor 1-6 during a carbine course, but that was last year so I don't have any side by side. But I don't see any noticeable difference in FOV / Illumination / etc.
Last edited by RHINOWSO; 07-01-17 at 11:08.
Can anyone compare the quality of the Gen II PST 1-6x with the Burris XTR II scope? I'm trying to decide between the Vortex or the XTR II 1-8x model. I have not seen or handled either one in person.
Thanks,
Cuz.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I have not looked through the 1-6 or 1-8. But I have looked through a 3-15 Burris and a 5-25 PST. The PST was slightly better glass. I do have multiple 1-6 Razors and that glass is supirior to both. That said I think the Burris 1-8 is quite a bit more expensive than the 1-6 PST. Not sure it's worth it unless you need the 8x.
T
Bookmarks