Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 42

Thread: Restrike capable?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    269
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks for all the info. I agree that training should resolve this by chambering a new round. I just wanted to be sure what they were talking about. I'm a hammer fire guy but the new p320 has gotten my attention. Can any one briefly explain how a striker fire mechanism works?
    I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves; and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them but to inform their discretion.

    Thomas Jefferson

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    1,672
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mysteryman View Post
    Th vast majority of type one stoppages(no bang when you expected one) are due to unseated magazines which means you either didn't chamber a round to start or you got off one round before the gun failed to load another due to an unseated magazine. Pulling the trigger repeatedly is a waste of time. I don't doubt that you may pull the trigger repeatedly before processing a stoppage while under stress. However a dead trigger is far more informative than one that works while under stress. Auditory seclusion, tunnel vision etc all play against you and having a trigger that functions with a gun/cartridge that doesn't may give you a false sense of "hey I'm chucking lead down range" when in fact you're simply dry firing the shit out of your gun. Your immediate action drill/response should be instinctive and will greatly reduce the possibility of repeated trigger pulling. Second strike capability is a bullshit marketing gimmick.

    MM
    The vast majority of stoppages, sure, but that's arguably because most shooters have poor manipulations; I have never had that occur to me, though I have had other stoppages, due to dead primers, rounds that didn't feed properly due to size issues, etc. I'm not disputing than an immediate action drill is far preferable, or saying that we should make sacrifices in order to gain a second strike capability; nor am I saying that plastering it on as a marketing point isn't a gimmick, just merely that second strike is not completely useless.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fjallhrafn View Post
    Nevertheless, he does not recommend utilizing a pistol's restrike capability, but simply removes the Tap part of "Tap Rack Bang". (He also said that this works for him and with the guns he uses, and that it may not work for you and will not work for everyone.)
    Ironic, given that his company's name is Tap-Rack Tactical.
    Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.

    老僧三十年前未參禪時、見山是山、見水是水、及至後夾親見知識、有箇入處、見山不是山、見水不是水、而今得箇體歇處、依然見山秪是山、見水秪是水。

    https://www.instagram.com/defaultmp3/

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    DFW
    Posts
    533
    Feedback Score
    19 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by HwyKnight View Post
    I'm a hammer fire guy but the new p320 has gotten my attention. Can any one briefly explain how a striker fire mechanism works?
    Super simple version: Rather than a hammer fired mechanism where the falling hammer strikes the firing pin which strikes the primer, in a striker fired gun the trigger pulling aft pulls the striker aft against spring tension until it (the trigger bar or sear) eventually slides off the bottom of the firing pin/striker, allowing it to fly forward under spring tension and strike the primer.

    ETA: here's a great video that shows how the Glock mechanism works through a cutaway gun:

    Last edited by DirectTo; 12-07-16 at 17:41.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    36
    Feedback Score
    0
    The restrike capability of most double action autos is a very minor - but not worthless - benefit.

    Bad primers and light firing pin strikes are not uncommon and frequently a second attempt will work.

    A second pull of the trigger
    1) is very natural - especially for inexperenced auto shooters
    2) literally takes a fraction of a second
    3) can quickly and easily be performed with one hand

    In addition, a full release and subsequent pull of the trigger is the proper remedy for a failure to fire caused by the trigger not fully resetting from the previous shot due to operator error.

    I recently had a primer fail to ignite despite what appeared to be a solid hit. The training round fired on the second strike after being rechambered. I will still confidently carry that Glock 26 despite its lack of instant restrike capability.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,944
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by CoryCop25 View Post
    It's a useless capability in my opinion.
    Correct. End of story!
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    884
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Defaultmp3 View Post
    I have been told that under stress, while attempting to shoot at speed, it is not uncommon for one to keep pulling the trigger before one processes the fact that the gun is no longer shooting due to a bad/hard primer. In such an instance, a second strike capability may have some use.
    I've done this with my USP45. Not under stress, per-say, but just having some fun with a mag dump. I was firing as fast as I could and second-struck a round that didn't go off the first time; it did go off on the second hit and through the rest of the mag I went. I didn't even realize what happened until it was over. I confirmed with one of my buddies.

    Just sayin'.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    3,091
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by markm View Post
    Correct. End of story!
    Many things get taken out of context of of timing/eras.

    When the 1911 was first replaced by the M9,
    The most common FTF was considered to be a hard/Failed primer,
    Which would most likely go off with a second strike.

    Then Glocks came on board and the lack of a second strike was back.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    9,937
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Talon167 View Post
    I've done this with my USP45. Not under stress, per-say, but just having some fun with a mag dump. I was firing as fast as I could and second-struck a round that didn't go off the first time; it did go off on the second hit and through the rest of the mag I went. I didn't even realize what happened until it was over. I confirmed with one of my buddies.

    Just sayin'.
    Is that USP DAO? Because most folks don't reset far enough to re-engage the DA pull.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    N.E. OH
    Posts
    7,616
    Feedback Score
    0
    I've had a few bad center fire primers. I've had multi bad rimfire primers.

    A second attempt never worked. I want to know as soon as a round fails, and I want a new round in ASAP.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    9,937
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Fjallhrafn View Post
    Bill Blowers, in a Primary & Seconday video on YouTube describing his unique manual of arms for pistols states that he has only seen a couple of trained shooters have type ones due to an unseated magazine and that most of the type one malfunctions he had seen were a result of bad primers (particularly as the quality of plinking ammunition drops to keep prices low).

    Nevertheless, he does not recommend utilizing a pistol's restrike capability, but simply removes the Tap part of "Tap Rack Bang". (He also said that this works for him and with the guns he uses, and that it may not work for you and will not work for everyone.)
    Unless his context is purely competition, that is full of fail.

    Key words: 'only a couple' and 'most'

    Immediate action should be a process to clear ALL fail to fire, feed or eject malfunctions not requiring remedial action. Not just most.

    Everybody has to have something quirky to differentiate themselves, in this case I think it is a disservice to the safety of a majority of shooters.

    Once again, unless he is speaking to the strictly competition shooter.

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •