M&P 2.0

**C4IGrant** · 02-24-17, 21:32

Got a 2.0 in. Measured the slide to hood fit. Came in at .003.

C4

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

**MegademiC** · 02-24-17, 22:34

Originally Posted by C4IGrant

Got a 2.0 in. Measured the slide to hood fit. Came in at .003.

C4

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

In your experience, what's the acceptable range/tolorance ?

**C4IGrant** · 02-24-17, 22:35

Originally Posted by MegademiC

In your experience, what's the acceptable range/tolorance ?

Depends. What is your budget and how good of a shooter are you??

C4

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

**mtdawg169** · 02-24-17, 23:08

Originally Posted by C4IGrant

Got a 2.0 in. Measured the slide to hood fit. Came in at .003.

C4

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Translation? Where would you prefer that number to be?

**tarkeg** · 02-24-17, 23:16

For a factory M&P, .003 is very good. Heck, .006 is good, and I've seen bigger.

**mtdawg169** · 02-24-17, 23:24

Originally Posted by tarkeg

For a factory M&P, .003 is very good. Heck, .006 is good, and I've seen bigger.

Measuring the difference between the barrel hood length and where it fits into the slide?

**C4IGrant** · 02-25-17, 09:41

Originally Posted by mtdawg169

Translation? Where would you prefer that number to be?

.003 is the highest I would accept (especially on an M&P). On say a Glock, no big deal. The reason is that the M&P starts to shoot a pattern and not a group at 25yds and the Glock will just shoot a little high.

It is true that non-2.0 M&P's could have a slide to frame fit of .006-.008.

For me, I want something around .002 or less. With that said, the MAJORITY of shooters will not be able to take advantage of barrel/hood fit this tight.

C4

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk