Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: 16" vs. 18" AR10 at reasonable hunting distances?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Fayetteville, NC
    Posts
    2,146
    Feedback Score
    11 (100%)
    I've been hunting with my 16" LMT MWS for the last 2 years and I've shot deer and hogs out to 400 yards +/- without any issues at all. I've been shooting Nosler 165gr Accubond ammunition as my hunting ammo. I see no reason to go with a 18" barrel. Below is a pic of my setup. I don't hunt with the bipod though. The weapon alone is heavy as is and I hunt from a climbing treestand most of the time. No need for a bipod.

    IMG_0902.jpg
    ____________________________________
    Duck Tape can't fix stupid but it sure muffles the sound!

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,422
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I think barrel length absolutely matters when choosing an AR10 for hunting. Keep in mind that nearly every .308 hunting bullet available needs a minimum expansion velocity of 1800-2200 FPS. At those velocities you won't get ideal expansion rather you will obtain some level of minimum expansion. With a 16 inch barrel, depending on bullet weight you are looking at 2300-2500 FPS at the muzzle which means you are in the ideal velocity range at the muzzle. I chose a 20 inch DPMS G2 Hunter which should give adequate velocity out to 300 yards for bullet expansion.

    The pic below is of a 110 grain .277 but all Barnes bullets with the exception of the 110 grain 30834 Black Tip and the Barnes TAC-X SBR as well as cup and core or bonded bullets are limited to similar thresholds due to bullet construction. The additional velocity of a 20 inch barrel is worth it to me when hunting elk or deer in the western US. My G2 is under 7 1/4 lbs with a carbine receiver extension and Magpul CTR stock so 4 inches of added barrel length really isn't much of an issue. The fact that it lacks a flash suppressor puts the overall length at just 3 inches over that of my 16 inch barrel 5.56 carbine with A2 flash suppressor.



    Last edited by Nightvisionary; 01-17-17 at 08:10.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    689
    Feedback Score
    0
    308 doesn't lose as much velocity at 223/5.56 when you go shorter barrel but that being said 16 is as short as I would go. The 18 will give you some more velocity but it doesn't sound like you look to make this a bench rest gun and don't need the extra velocity. For hogs 16 is good because you can still swing that gun in brush if you have to.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,422
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Here is an informative test on .308 barrel length per inch vs velocity. Just keep in mind a bolt gun is used so an auto loading rifle will have slightly lower velocity numbers. For example the velocities listed for 19 inches with 147 grain Winchester are about what I get from my FAL with a 21 inch barrel.

    http://rifleshooter.com/2014/12/308-...ty-28-to-16-5/

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Wyoming
    Posts
    149
    Feedback Score
    0
    I prefer an 18 inch but we tend to stretch the .308 Win in hunting situations.

    If you keep shots under 300yds the 16 is more than adequate.

    8 elk this day from 120yds to 600yds.



    Pretty nice bull taken at 450yds. Most likely a 16 would have done fine.

    Director of Operations
    Co owner Wyoming Arms

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    11,468
    Feedback Score
    46 (100%)
    That is a lifetime of elk. I envy you.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    2,287
    Feedback Score
    0
    I hunt deer at that range with a 16" Armalite. No issues. The weight savings over a longer, heavier barrel makes the hump to the stand easier as well.




    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    216
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    I use a 200 yard zero and MPBR due to closer shots always inside 300 and even at that only certain times of year. 24" Weatherby and a 18" DPMS they all bow to the muzzle just the same. The .308 is a great round and in a semi-auto it's a fantastic hunting platform. The Weatherby sees less and less action as time goes on.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Concord, NC
    Posts
    265
    Feedback Score
    0
    Don't think I have seen this factor mentioned in this thread, but muzzle blast of a 16" 308 can be pretty rough.
    My perspective is FAL not AR. I have a 16" FAL and a 21" standard FAL. HUGE difference.
    I shot a deer last year with the 16" standing parallel to the side of a hill. So the ground on my right was maybe 3' away. It absolutely rang my bell. So much so, I now wear electronic ear muffs when I hunt with the 16.
    Last edited by LDM; 02-03-17 at 09:36.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    2,058
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Failure2Stop View Post
    I would have no reason to own or recommend an 18" barrel over a 16 or 20, and really, there are only a few (professional) users that I would recommend a 20 over a 16 for.
    I'm curious as to your reasoning. I've had an unfinished .308 project for several years now. I was planning to go with an 18" barrel. I didn't want the concussion o a 16" or the weight of a 20". I still don't want the concussion, so I can be swayed to go up to 20" if it makes more sense.
    "Man is still the first weapon of war" - Field Marshal Montgomery

    The Everyday Marksman

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •