G&R Tactical
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Upper Receiver Decision

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    143
    Feedback Score
    0

    Upper Receiver Decision

    Hello All,

    The longer I'm on this site, the more I find myself in analysis paralysis when I have to make a decision. I can't seem to do it without running it by the forum first. So, here goes.

    Before the election, I went on a panic buying spree getting the parts that I thought would be restricted for pretty much every build that I had planned for the foreseeable future. One of those was a new go to 'battle rifle' and one was a precision build.
    I picked up a Vltor MUR upper for the precision build because it was supposed to be more rigid and reduce POI shift. But, then I decided on an Aero enhanced upper and one of the associated rails that doesn't interface with the barrel nut to try and avoid the POI shift altogether. So, I decided that I'd use the MUR for my battle rifle.

    Fast forward to tonight when I started to assemble things. I pull out the MUR upper and I see that I ordered the version without the forward assist. I decided that since it was going on a precision build I wouldn't need it. So, all of that leads to my decision:

    Should I go ahead and use the MUR despite the fact that it doesn't have an FA because it's supposedly tougher and I'll likely not need it? Or, should I use one of my standard Aero or Spikes uppers that may not be as rigid but that do have an FA just in case I need it?

    If you've made it this far, thank you for taking the time

    JRC

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    892
    Feedback Score
    0
    Its become kinda fashionable to claim the f/a is completely unnecessary and may only cause a problem is used, but when I talked with the two guys that are probably the top two AR builders in the world they both said they would never recommend a duty gun that didn't have one.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    central Texas
    Posts
    1,948
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I'm in " the have studied it, never done it" category but will offer my opinion. If you think that you may wish to sell or trade it later, absence of the forward assist may make the rifle harder to sell. Dealers would probably beat you down over not having the assist yet still would not reduce their resale price. So your trade value would be lower. If you intend to keep, treasure, and shoot the rifle, informed opinion seems to be that you would never use it. Of course, keeping it forever implies that your build will be satisfactory. Nothing is guaranteed. Since you have doubt, I suggest that you slightly reduce the price, sell yours, and buy another with forward assist. This option relieves fretting and will free you from having to answer a million questions about why you bought one without this feature.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    land of the sand
    Posts
    44
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    without the forward assist it does save a little weight

    in all honesty have you used it the FA in any situation?
    Me I have had problems with certain ARs not liking certain mags and the FA came into play but as for your build you want rigidity so just use the vltor model

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,341
    Feedback Score
    65 (100%)
    Just sell it and get the F/A version. Better to have it and not need it etc.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    4,724
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    One reason for building one without a FA is if you are a lefty. It gets in the way of operating and ambi charging handle IMO.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,341
    Feedback Score
    65 (100%)
    Why not the noveske vltor? They go great on gen2


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •