The appeal is that there is another AR manufacturer in the game. How is that a bad thing? I don't think anyone believes that this rifle will replace the HK416. Steyr is a quality manufacturer. Some of us have Steyr weapons and personally, I would add a Steyr made AR to my list of must have Steyr products. Will it replace my AUG, no. But I would probably use it in a carbine course, as most are taught on the AR system. I will not own another AR type rifle unless Steyr brings the STM556 or RS556 (whatever they name it) to market. I have it on good authority that this rifle is coming to market. I plan to have one of the first.While I think steyr makes some great stuff I just don't see the appeal of this. I would much rather spend money on other items in their lineup.
I don't view a QCB as a important feature on a rifle of this type. If I was a unit armorer with hundreds to maintain I might change my tune. However, as it sits, it has a monolithic upper with short handguards and a large exposed gas block that will undoubtedly get very hot. The Colt 6940 is a non starter for the same reason. We moved past this 10 years ago. I just find the HK 416 to be a much more thought out and mature looking system as long as you don't require a QCB. And the HK will no doubt have a Barrel that is on par with the Steyr and a decade long service history with some of the worlds most elite units. As far as king of the hill of the piston AR15 world, there is a clear stand out.
But the rifle will not compete with the 416. Rather the 433 is probably the heavy favorite to win considering it is a clean sheet design tailored specifically to the German desires for their rifle and due to the way it is made, it is more than likely cheaper to produce.
The Steyr AUG and .308 Scout rifles are already in my safe. This one will be beside them.
SamM
Bookmarks