Last edited by Bayoublaster; 03-03-17 at 08:09.
Industry Disclosure: I work at a local gun shop.
If Glock submitted anything like the 17 M models I would assume they failed the test miserably given the rapid recall of the IMPD guns.
Because the Sig did so well in the FBI tests (he said with sarcasm)? Lets not forget that the FBI RFP was written for the Sig and the gun failed every stage of the FBI testing. The same testing which the Glock M series obviously passed and was accepted. It is my understanding that the issue with the IMPD guns has been found and corrected.
12,500 rounds is not much of a durability test. The M9 was approximately twice that. If Sig can deliver a gun that works and has the reliability and durability necessary that's great but their track record in that department is not very stellar at this point.
Last edited by Digital_Damage; 03-03-17 at 12:41.
Glock may have protested because there was nothing in the solicitation that said the slide had to stay on the gun during use.
I kid the Glockers. Maybe the Russians hacked the army and ice trials.
Hell, it appears the Glock didn't even make the final two in The ICE trials. Maybe the FBI ultimately decided the difference was so minimal they should just stick it out with the guns they already had (holsters, armorers, mag pouches, etc) and be dumb be with it. Seems more likely than all the conspiracy spinning.
Bookmarks