Does the Left Have the Balls for an Actual War?

[Straight Shooter]

The only way to right this country is to hope they are stupid enough to start something.

WORD.

[Dist. Expert 26]

I had this debate while trolling a liberal Facebook page the other day. A woman there suggested that the left might start a civil war.

When I pointed out the obvious fallacy of her suggestion, that most on the left have never even held a gun, she had no coherent response. The closest thing we'll get to civil war is riots and hurt feelings. Maybe, maybe, a bomb or two. But outright war? No way.

[Alex V]

You should hear the lefty shit my cousins friends are spewing. I do troll the shit out of them but still. This morning one of them said she was going to kick my ass. I said great, but remember, if you try and kick my ass where you live, in PA, I'll be armed. She quieted the **** down, and quick.

That's what the left is, they make a lot of noise and have a lot of balls when they are a big group against one person. If they block a highway and all of a sudden a group of militia nuts with beards, plate carriers and rifles come out of the adjacent tree line, they will run with their tales between their legs.

But if they want to play out a Rage Against the Machine album then...I have no problem blacking out my face, putting on Tiger Stripes, and working on my ear necklace.

But.....I would hope people get over themselves instead

I f*ckng live this guy.

[lowprone]

Lefty women are way more militant than the men, but 99% of them have never had the piss
slapped out of them either.
But they will get right in your face and scream and yell knowing the popo will step in and
cover their ass.

[Jellybean]

Lefty women are way more militant than the men, but 99% of them have never had the piss
slapped out of them either.
But they will get right in your face and scream and yell knowing the popo will step in and
cover their ass.

And then there's that- everyone wants to be gangsta until it's time to DO gangsta shit...
They're currently used to being top dog in the "harassing and beating random people we hate" department. Nobody's beaten back.
Yet.
Then you'll know which way this all goes- it's all just speculation till then.


Now.... on the "is the left to cowardly to start an actual war?" question, well I'll put this in two parts;

1) The "right" ain't done shit either. I've made the rounds through the various patriot/ III%/whatthe****ever "stand and fight for your rights" [to parrrrtayyyyyy, sorry had to say it ]groups. It's all blab and no blam, so apparently nobody's got the "balls" to go full metal retard there either. And we all know which side would be more justified from a constitutional perspective at this point, so either things just aren't *quite* at that point or we are also all a bunch of pussies perfectly content to live in the "to early to shoot the bastards" phase forever.

2) And I'll follow that up with, there's more than one way to fight a war. As the infowars tagline goes "there's a war on for your mind". Just because the lead isn't flying doesn't mean it's not already hot and heavy out there... To many quick to rush to thinking of "war" in the "cutlass and cannonade" literal sense, they forget most wars are won and lost before they go hot. And who said your side "owns" the concept of a revolution anyway?
Reminds me of a quote from iRobot;

Lanning: The Three Laws will lead to only one logical outcome.
Spooner: What? What outcome?
Lanning: Revolution.
Spooner: Whose revolution?
Lanning: *That*, Detective, is the right question.

[RetroRevolver77]

And then there's that- everyone wants to be gangsta until it's time to DO gangsta shit...
They're currently used to being top dog in the "harassing and beating random people we hate" department. Nobody's beaten back.
Yet.
Then you'll know which way this all goes- it's all just speculation till then.


Now.... on the "is the left to cowardly to start an actual war?" question, well I'll put this in two parts;

1) The "right" ain't done shit either. I've made the rounds through the various patriot/ III%/whatthe****ever "stand and fight for your rights" [to parrrrtayyyyyy, sorry had to say it ]groups. It's all blab and no blam, so apparently nobody's got the "balls" to go full metal retard there either. And we all know which side would be more justified from a constitutional perspective at this point, so either things just aren't *quite* at that point or we are also all a bunch of pussies perfectly content to live in the "to early to shoot the bastards" phase forever.

2) And I'll follow that up with, there's more than one way to fight a war. As the infowars tagline goes "there's a war on for your mind". Just because the lead isn't flying doesn't mean it's not already hot and heavy out there... To many quick to rush to thinking of "war" in the "cutlass and cannonade" literal sense, they forget most wars are won and lost before they go hot. And who said your side "owns" the concept of a revolution anyway?
Reminds me of a quote from iRobot;

Lanning: The Three Laws will lead to only one logical outcome.
Spooner: What? What outcome?
Lanning: Revolution.
Spooner: Whose revolution?
Lanning: *That*, Detective, is the right question.

I guess you haven't been paying attention. While one side is crying in the streets the other side has been quietly buying up arms and ammo for the past eight years at a retarded pace. The right simply respects the rule of law, until there is nothing to respect. So far I'd say the right has been very determined to take back power and has done so across all branches of government. It's our time, we be President now.

[SteyrAUG]

Actual war? Nah... there are certainly a few Ayers types that will certainly bomb, but for the most part you are talking about (as I said in another thread) people who will literally shit their pants at the mere sight of a gun. So, more dupes with bandanna covered faces breaking windows and shouting "we want free lattes and TV's!"

Yep, they'd never fight in the open in a stand up war. They will use the tactics of cowards and engage in terrorism, arson, looting, bombings and random shootings.

[SteyrAUG]

Lefty women are way more militant than the men, but 99% of them have never had the piss
slapped out of them either.
But they will get right in your face and scream and yell knowing the popo will step in and
cover their ass.

Looks at terrorists groups from the 70s, females typically were more ruthless and willing to kill and even die for their cause than males in the group.

[Vandal]

Yep, they'd never fight in the open in a stand up war. They will use the tactics of cowards and engage in terrorism, arson, looting, bombings and random shootings.

The same tactics of our current enemies? I agree, if (and that's a big if) they choose to fight it will be an insurgency style fight. Now, they will also be fighting an insurgency with better weapons, training and mindset. The weak, useful idiots and stupid would be culled quickly though on both sides before it transitions to a war of attrition.

[BoringGuy45]

1) The "right" ain't done shit either. I've made the rounds through the various patriot/ III%/whatthe****ever "stand and fight for your rights" [to parrrrtayyyyyy, sorry had to say it ]groups. It's all blab and no blam, so apparently nobody's got the "balls" to go full metal retard there either. And we all know which side would be more justified from a constitutional perspective at this point, so either things just aren't *quite* at that point or we are also all a bunch of pussies perfectly content to live in the "to early to shoot the bastards" phase forever.

This is very true too. When leftist states pass draconian gun bans and gun owners are stuck in those states, we say it's your own damn fault for living there. Get in your covered wagon, move to a free state, and shut the f*** up; your problems are not my problems. When more rightist states pass laws that a pro-life or anti-transgender, every leftist in the nation answers the call. They hound, boycott, riot, and sue the state into repealing the law. How many times do we say "Molon labe!" and "These colors don't run!" Then when the left passes something, rather than fight, we say "f**k it, I'm done with this shit. Everybody sucks and I'll be GLAD when this shitty failed experiment called the United States finally collapses! I'm heading for the hills; don't bother me!"

I will agree that it is still too early to shoot the bastards. The rioters generally burn down their own neighborhoods, and blocking highways the way they have is not a deadly force situation. But, that IS a situation for an ass beating. There needs to be more of an attempt to agitate them; force the left to either shut up or go to violence. I have a feeling that at least factions of them will start to use more serious violence sooner or later, so I'd rather they do it sooner while the pendulum is swung slightly in our direction, and they'd lose public support for doing so.