- Will
General Performance/Fitness Advice for all
www.BrinkZone.com
LE/Mil specific info:
https://brinkzone.com/category/swatleomilitary/
“Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”
Collateral is a way different movie than John Wick:
First of all, Vincent didn't have any motivation for killing anyone, he had a job to do and he executed it professionally, John Wick was purely emotional, revenge was his motivation. In Collateral, we didn't even get to see the first 2 victims, the first guy landed on the cab, the second wasn't shown but we saw Vincent kill 2 tweekers while walking back to the cab. We see Vincent again kill the jazz club owner after discussing Miles Davis. Peter Lim as well as his private security were all killed in a nightclub along with 2 of Felix's security and a detective. John Wick killed at least 10 people in his house, 10 people in the club, 4 in the church, 5 in the parking lot, 5 in the safe house and a few others. I agree that John Wick used too many Judo moves and I find that unbelievable in a stressful environment where you are engaged by 8-10 people in a small area.
Heat was a lot better in my opinion just on plot but of coarse there is no way 4 bank robbers with F/A M16s can escape an entire police force on foot. Case in point is the N Hollywood shootout and they were wearing body armor. The accountant was decent, plot was good, story line sucked. I wouldn't risk my life for Anna Kendrick for any reason but people with Asperger's could have extreme knowledge and discipline in a certain area that they found comfort with. Sicario was a good movie all around, Triple 9 was another good movie
Its all Hollywood thought. Accuracy would bore us to death, that's why we watch movies and TV because reality is sub par for most.
Actually, if you study up, the N. Hollywood robbers had committed several successful robberies prior to the shootout.
Their main mistake was they had no cogent plan or training. They had violence of action and firepower initially but got separated. With their weaponry and armor, had they any tactics then a lot of cops would be dead.
At that point in time it would have been entirely possible to at least buy time given the dearth of active shooter training of that era. Same with the Norco robbers.
I wouldn't be trying to ponder TTP from films where all guns fire blanks and everyone goes home after playing pretend.
If you can find it, look up some South African police footage. It's rather Wild Westy. Same with Colombian police footage. Nothing I would advocate stateside but if you want to see guys getting gunned down with FALs and Galils
they robbed an armored car prior and a small credit union, a VHS copy of Heat was found in there VCR after the shootout. Those guys were wanting to act out a movie they liked. They anticipated a shoot out, that's why they carried so much firepower. Too much luggage, no get away driver, just shooting 1100 rounds randomly. At least Robert DeNiro and Val Kilmer got away, they knew how to cover each other to move up.
I think there is merit to continuing discussion of different retention training and techniques. I am always trying to learn positive and new tools for the toolbox. Realistically, as a civilian if I ever have to use my firearm in defense it's going to be in very close quarters.
Some fantastic stuff there. I would love to take his training course.
98% Sarcastic. 100% Overthinking things and making up reasons for buying a new firearm.
98% Sarcastic. 100% Overthinking things and making up reasons for buying a new firearm.
FWIW, CAR isn't very well looked upon over at TPI, which is Craig Douglas's own little forum. If that hivemind don't like CAR (as a system, anyway), then there's probably a good reason (being bladed constrains movement, the need to switch hands for different angles of approach, using the weak side eye to aim, etc.).
I'll also note that, despite loving the rest of the movie, the CAR was (hilariously) one of the first things they picked up on and criticized.
Last edited by Defaultmp3; 02-21-17 at 13:33.
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.
老僧三十年前未參禪時、見山是山、見水是水、及至後夾親見知識、有箇入處、見山不是山、見水不是水、而今得箇體歇處、依然見山秪是山、見水秪是水。
https://www.instagram.com/defaultmp3/
My default response is to go take a Shivworks ECQC. Here is my AAR of my ECQC: https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread...-19-Houston-TX
I have not done too much other weapons-based combatives training, outside of a Tarani edged weapons course. However, people I respect all state that ECQC is at the top of the heap for that kind of stuff, and it was certainly by far the most eye-opening class for me by a long shot. It is the one class I recommend everyone take once they are safe and competent with a handgun. Paul Sharp and Cecil Burch also buy into the Shivworks methodology, and while most of their classes are little less handgun oriented, do work the use of handgun access into their classes (using blue guns, mostly).
Random anecdote. Couple weeks ago, a guy was asking folks if he would be better off taking ECQC or a Steve Fisher CHE. Fisher told the guy to take ECQC.
Last edited by Defaultmp3; 02-21-17 at 16:19.
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.
老僧三十年前未參禪時、見山是山、見水是水、及至後夾親見知識、有箇入處、見山不是山、見水不是水、而今得箇體歇處、依然見山秪是山、見水秪是水。
https://www.instagram.com/defaultmp3/
Bookmarks