Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 789
Results 81 to 89 of 89

Thread: Popularity of the 12.5" carbine-gas SBR?

  1. #81
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    SOMD
    Posts
    908
    Feedback Score
    50 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by jackblack73 View Post
    40% is the increase from 10.5" to 11.5" per Paul from BCM. Not sure that same number applies 11.5 to 12.5.
    I did the math a while back based on the a 20" rifle, M193. 10.5 to 11.5 is 33% increase. 11.5 to 12.5 is 24%. 10.5 to 12.5 is a 65% increase in dwell.

    Baseline (20" Rifle aka 20R)
    20.0" 0.184ms

    Mid Length Gas
    11.5” 0.053ms 71% less dwell time (or 29% of the dwell time of the baseline)
    12.5” 0.079ms 57% less dwell time
    14.5” 0.139ms 25% less dwell time
    16.0” 0.181ms 2% less dwell time

    Carbine Gas
    10.5” 0.090ms 51% less dwell time
    11.5” 0.120ms 35% less dwell time
    12.5” 0.149ms 19% less dwell time
    14.5” 0.206ms 12% MORE dwell time
    16.0” 0.248ms 35% MORE dwell time

  2. #82
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    69
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    They all work with the correct gas port size, some just better than others. The cyclic rate historically has been higher the shorter the barrel. Modern "mechanisms" like the A5 stock and such helps correct some of the deficiencies - to a point. Physics are physics and there is only so much that can be done.

    Running a 10.3 hard is tough on the weapon, the toughest. When it isn't yours, but the taxpayer's rifle, no worries.

    12.5" is a happy medium between 10.3" and a 16" mid, functions well, and suppresses well.

    edited to add, so the increase in dwell time is linear? 10.5 to 12.5 would be 32%? Pretty substantial if so.

    note the difference between 11.5 and 12.5, also substantial, but between 12.5 and 14.5, not so much.
    Last edited by juliet9; 09-01-17 at 18:11.

  3. #83
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,114
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Rayrevolver View Post
    I did the math a while back based on the a 20" rifle, M193. 10.5 to 11.5 is 33% increase. 11.5 to 12.5 is 24%. 10.5 to 12.5 is a 65% increase in dwell.

    Baseline (20" Rifle aka 20R)
    20.0" 0.184ms

    Mid Length Gas
    11.5” 0.053ms 71% less dwell time (or 29% of the dwell time of the baseline)
    12.5” 0.079ms 57% less dwell time
    14.5” 0.139ms 25% less dwell time
    16.0” 0.181ms 2% less dwell time

    Carbine Gas
    10.5” 0.090ms 51% less dwell time
    11.5” 0.120ms 35% less dwell time
    12.5” 0.149ms 19% less dwell time
    14.5” 0.206ms 12% MORE dwell time
    16.0” 0.248ms 35% MORE dwell time
    Just out of curiosity, what curve did you base this on? A reference may help.
    Last edited by tom12.7; 09-01-17 at 18:28. Reason: My numbers don't match this and I'm curious about a few things.

  4. #84
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    3,516
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by tom12.7 View Post
    Just out of curiosity, what curve did you base this on? A reference may help.
    Most likely this

    http://www.ar15barrels.com/prod/operation.shtml

    Last edited by Clint; 09-01-17 at 19:06.
    Black River Tactical
    BRT OPTIMUM Hammer Forged Chrome Lined Barrels - 11.5", 12.5", 14.5", 16"
    BRT EZTUNE Preset Gas Tubes - PISTOL, CAR, MID, RIFLE
    BRT Bolt Carrier Groups M4A1, M16 CHROME
    BRT Covert Comps 5.56, 6X, 7.62

  5. #85
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,114
    Feedback Score
    0
    Possibly so, I do like the 12.5" 5.56 carbine gas AR base for a few reasons.

  6. #86
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    4,364
    Feedback Score
    17 (100%)
    Clint and Tom, what are your opinions on 12.5" or 13" mid length barrels as a concept, assuming gas port size and geometry would be optimized?

    Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk
    "That thing looks about as enjoyable as a bowl of exploding dicks." - Magic_Salad0892

    "The body cannot go where the mind has not already been."

  7. #87
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,114
    Feedback Score
    0
    Around 13.5"ish is about my lower length limit for a mid length gas 5.56 AR for most. Depending on the selected ammunition, chamber, throat, bore, port, possible cans, action, etc.. You can go less than that if you can accept more compromises, but the uses become more specific and less general with compromises similar for the function of the system.

  8. #88
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    3,516
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by BufordTJustice View Post
    Clint and Tom, what are your opinions on 12.5" or 13" mid length barrels as a concept, assuming gas port size and geometry would be optimized?

    Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk
    Too short for general purpose use, but just about perfect for dedicated suppressed use.

    Unsuppressed, there is enough gas drive available, but timing is less than ideal.
    Last edited by Clint; 09-16-17 at 22:53.
    Black River Tactical
    BRT OPTIMUM Hammer Forged Chrome Lined Barrels - 11.5", 12.5", 14.5", 16"
    BRT EZTUNE Preset Gas Tubes - PISTOL, CAR, MID, RIFLE
    BRT Bolt Carrier Groups M4A1, M16 CHROME
    BRT Covert Comps 5.56, 6X, 7.62

  9. #89
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SeattHELL, Soviet Socialist S***hole of Washington
    Posts
    8,451
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dano5326 View Post
    Almost 20 years ago I had some 12.5", perhaps the first USG ones, uppers made for M4's. The reason was simply as short as possible while able to mount the m203 (9" barrel) using the barrel knotch mount of that era. A side benefit was the increased length made for a better size stick to pumel non-compliants with.

    We did not change the gas port size and had no issues.

    OAL w/ suppressor is handier vs 14.5"

    Also the MV is greatly improved over the 10.3"

    There is certainly a potential reliability increase, considering the dwell time, with a wider range of ammunition and tempature ranges.

    In short a happy medium
    This a precursor to the GL-SSC?

    I'd consider building one of these uppers, if the handguards weren't unicorns... granted, because NFA is a nuisance when you're surrounded by Leftofascist arsebandits I'd be mounting it on a pistol lower, but I'm kinda weird in that like Legos my "fun" is in the building stage.
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    Ye best start believin' in Orwellian Dystopias, mateys... yer LIVIN' in one!--after Capt. Hector Barbossa
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 789

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •