My buddy uses a FLIR RS32 - the base model. It's good compared to nothing, but I want something with a little more resolution. His max deer sized animal detection range is about 250 yards which is pretty good but at that range it's just an orange blob. (See below why that's an issue) We use thermal for finding piggies at the market and on their way home, and when we decide to do SUTs for giggles on about 100 acres of swampland. We do not bait anything to make it "fun" but we have in the past to make it "easy". It is no shit walking around palmettos and getting spiders and bugs on you while hoping you don't step on a rattler or get Zika. Durability and waterproofing is paramount.
I can't decide, and am seeking input to help me choose, if I want to spot with a handheld or use a weapon mounted optic.
We all use NV to navigate which is way easier than using thermal. Given that our weapons are slung and we are walking, a thermal handheld seems much more practical than weapon mounted. Additionally our weapons are ready to go with IR lasers if we come up to something, and by choosing weapon mounted you have to remove your day optic and hope your thermal retained zero. Ain't nobody trying to scan and assess all day with a rifle up to their shoulder.
On the other hand, I have been in situations where game could be seen through the FLIR but not through NV even though we knew it was there! You can't shoot what you can't see.
Another problem we have with the FLIR is that every single orange tree is lit up like a Christmas tree. It's impossible to differentiate game from trees in the groves. I'm not sure if other optics will rectify that issue but I figured I'd make the issue known anyway.
Bookmarks