Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: 9mm 115 grain Match and Duty Ammo Accuracy Test

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    439
    Feedback Score
    0
    Deleted
    Last edited by bfoosh006; 08-29-17 at 19:31.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Classified
    Posts
    43
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bfoosh006 View Post
    Thank You for the link, I enjoyed that info as well.

    I will say... Winc. .. seems to be slowly allowing itself to fall into a third class ammo producer... their designs are great.. but the assembly and QC, lacks.

    Having fired tens of thousands of various brands, etc, over the decades... I have watched Winc. allow it to continue.


    As for your cost comment.... I hear ya... I have been assembling various 9x19 for a 16" carbine velocity test v. Beretta 4.9" ( possibly a 10"ish as well )

    After buying about 81 different weights, brands and such... my head swims... I have to keep a list of what I have, just so I don't re-buy it ! Lol...

    ( Not to mention finding other .223 / 5.56 rounds I haven't chrono'd )

    I realize BBTI has a variety of tests... but it is a little dated.

    And some of the other 9x19 tests on YouTube show me a more up to date test is needed...


    Again, thanks for such an easy to read, informative 124gr test / report !
    Thank you, I really appreciate that.

    That's disappointing to hear about Winchester. I picked up some Ranger T's in .45 for my next test and was hoping they would perform better.

    Geez, I can't even imagine 81 different loads. I bought 16 different ones for my .45 ammo test and ended up ordering duplicates of a couple.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •