Wilson Combat Beretta 92G Brigadier Tactical or 92G Centurion Tactical?

[thegreyman]

Choosing between Wilson Combat Beretta 92G Brigadier Tactical and new 92G Centurion Tactical is tough; which do you prefer? And why?

[CWM11B]

I have a Brig Tac, and really like it, primarily because I am a fan of the 92G SD, which is damn near a unicorn (after getting my brig tac I found one and bought it). I also have a Franken Cent Tac I just bought off a guy on another forum: M9A-1 frame, Centurion slide, LTT grips. If I were buying now and could only have the one, it would probably be the CenTac. Holsters are going to be easier to find and I suspect it will carry better. Those thoughts are based on a presumption of your intended use. Either way, if you are a 92 series fan I believe you'll be happy.

[TacticalFun]

I bought the centurion today.

Sent from my SM-G955U1 using Tapatalk

[CWM11B]

Nice! As soon as I get a bit more disposable income I'll pick one up myself.

[MountainRaven]

I prefer the BrigTac because I don't see a benefit to the shorter barrel of the Centurion.

[ramairthree]

I have a few Centurions, but in all honesty, the half inch barrel differs makes virtually no difference to me.

I like full sized service pistols. Like the Glock 17 or regular 92.

I like compact guns. Like a G19.

I notice the difference between the two.
I do not really like 4.5 inch barrel guns with a full grip.
Or 4.5 inch barrel guns with a compact grip.