Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 67

Thread: Attack the Carl Vinson?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    7,826
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)
    NK has detained 3 US citizens now.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    11,866
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by tb-av View Post
    NK has detained 3 US citizens now.
    Any U.S. citizens going to North Korea right now are idiots.
    11C2P '83-'87
    Airborne Infantry
    F**k China!

  3. #13
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    7,826
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)
    I think this guy was actually trying to get out. A professor of some sort I believe.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    8,715
    Feedback Score
    0
    IMHO time to slap the fat boy silly !!!
    keeping him alive so he can see it happen would be best put them on trial for human rights violations with all the camps etc..

    maybe just life in prison in some nasty jail

    let South Korea take control and give it a generation to bring them back to reality

  5. #15
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    midwest
    Posts
    8,217
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    I envision Fat Boy's trembling finger hovering over "the button" as his muddled mind stumbles over the various resultant consequences of pushing it, while he fails to account for the fact that the rest of the world in general and the USA in particular is not subject to his autocratic reality-distortion field.

    Doesn't North Korea have a submarine or two? That would be one way. It would be a decidedly less dramatic end, silent gurgling, than the Norks loosing a couple of ASBMs, the result of which would definitely play out better on television.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    11,866
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Hmac View Post
    I envision Fat Boy's trembling finger hovering over "the button" as his muddled mind stumbles over the various resultant consequences of pushing it, while he fails to account for the fact that the rest of the world in general and the USA in particular is not subject to his autocratic reality-distortion field.

    Doesn't North Korea have a submarine or two? That would be one way. It would be a decidedly less dramatic end, silent gurgling, than the Norks loosing a couple of ASBMs, the result of which would definitely play out better on television.
    I'm gonna go out on a limb here and guess the U.S. Navy is prepared for that.

    Also gonna guess the Norks don't have cutting-edge sub technology either. Diesel boats perhaps, which are definitely more "noisy" than nuclear powered ones.

    No matter how you look at it the situation is lose-lose for those jackasses.
    11C2P '83-'87
    Airborne Infantry
    F**k China!

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    13,549
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Everybody on TV hypes up NK as being this big nuclear power yet tgey cant keep their lights on and resort to cannnibalism

    Per Americans being detained....they have zero reason to be near,that place
    Last edited by Firefly; 04-23-17 at 18:52.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,452
    Feedback Score
    0
    You wonder what kind of assets and programs the Chinese having running there? I'm guessing they have some kind of decapitation plan and relationship with major military leaders.

    An attack on a CVN group would see all their naval assets and ASM assets zapped. You'd have to do it.
    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Hamburg PA
    Posts
    3,506
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by GTF425 View Post
    You see there is the problem. They'd see glowing in the dark as an upgrade.
    "I don't collect guns anymore, I stockpile weapons for ****ing war." Chuck P.

    "Some days you eat the bacon, and other days the bacon eats you." SeriousStudent

    "Don't complain when after killing scores of women and children in a mall, a group of well armed men who train to shoot people like you in the face show up to say hello." WillBrink

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    9,937
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ABNAK View Post
    I'm gonna go out on a limb here and guess the U.S. Navy is prepared for that.

    Also gonna guess the Norks don't have cutting-edge sub technology either. Diesel boats perhaps, which are definitely more "noisy" than nuclear powered ones.

    No matter how you look at it the situation is lose-lose for those jackasses.
    According to Wiki - a completely trustworthy source - NK has 76 Whiskey class subs (diesel electric). China bought them from Russia and then started building them for themselves, NK bought four from China and then started building them. On the last Russian subs there was a substantial decrease in noise signature, a reduction of 20 dB to 140 dB in comparison to the 160 dB of the original Soviet Project 633 submarines acquired by China. Unknown to me if the NK Whiskeys are that quiet.

    They also have one Sinpo-class sub which is reportedly a reverse engineered Soviet Golf-II. This apparently is the platform which launched the two successful SLBM's. It is diesel also.

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •