Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 38

Thread: Nyx Bolt Carrier Group

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,751
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)

    Nyx Bolt Carrier Group

    Checking to see if there is any merit in this. Looks similar in concept to the Surefire/Jim Sullivan designed long stroke bolt carrier. Unfortunately its made of Ti and comes with an NiB bolt and has some non-staked gas key which makes me question if this will hold up to hard use.

    https://www.masterofarms.com/product/nyx-carrier/


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    West TN
    Posts
    196
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    What's your goal? If it's paying 4x the cost of a proven product it will be perfect. If you're trying to build some kind of ultra light carry more than you shoot rig it might be ok too. But otherwise too many added parts/variables to put in something that you want too be 100% dependable.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    2,287
    Feedback Score
    0
    They lost me at "tuned recoil experience".



    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    565
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    It would match a Salient Arms Glock.

    You might try running that BCG in a dual-forward-assist Cobalt Ar.
    Nobody ever got shot climbing over the wall into East Berlin.

    Delivering the most precision possible, at the greatest distance possible, with the highest rate of fire possible.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Sandhills NC
    Posts
    676
    Feedback Score
    23 (100%)
    Why is it here?

    I mean, just: WHY?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,234
    Feedback Score
    0
    $525?

    -All that and they can't stake the gas key?

    -What's the life of those springs? Can you get spares?

    -I'm not crazy about the tiny snap ring at the end, either.

    -Lots of cost and complexity for little return. What problem does it solve?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,751
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Scrubber3 View Post
    Why is it here?

    I mean, just: WHY?
    Why? Because actually doing something with the tail of carrier is a huge step forward in improving the M16 fow. Jim Sullivan and surefires carrier is similar in nature but it's vapor wear. I believe the ferfrans carrier also does something similar but you can't buy them anymore. Doing something like putting a miniature constant recoil system in the tail of carrier would be ingenious. Even if the nyx carrier is poorly thought out and executed it's still a step forward that I hope other designers will start toying with.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    CONUS
    Posts
    4,207
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by vicious_cb View Post
    M16 fow.
    what's 'fow'? family of weapons?
    the ferfrans carrier is for rate reduction on full auto.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,751
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by militarymoron View Post
    what's 'fow'? family of weapons?
    the ferfrans carrier is for rate reduction on full auto.
    Yes, ar-15/M16 family of weapons. Ive never seen a ferfrans bolt carrier in person so Im unsure how it actually works. Does it use a counter weight system? I know the Sullivan bolt carrier uses a duel spring design.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,114
    Feedback Score
    0
    That's not the direction that I would be looking towards.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •