New Daniel Defense 7.62 Suppressor

[scooter22]

How do you figure? You can swap from a MAAD mount to an ASR mount with SilencerCo cans without any legal ramifications.

Because it's not serialized

[TheChunkNorris]

http://www.recoilweb.com/recoiltv-nr...or-127849.html

The difference is that the SiCo, the body of the suppressor is the serial part. And on the DD they can do what they do because the mount will not unscrew from the suppressor...

Based on the ATF's requirements I can see where they're going with this. Didn't realize the guidance was just to have that information anywhere on the can and not the body alone.

[Marler5811]

Do I understand correctly that the mount is the serialized part? So in the unfortunate instance of a baffle strike I can send the tube back for repair/replacement?
Holy Bovine! This is a new concept

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

This is correct.

[SonOfAGunn]

This is correct.

I thought that the mount had to be removed using a special tool that DD developed for this suppressor. I like the idea of just sending the tube better though!

[Marler5811]

I thought that the mount had to be removed using a special tool that DD developed for this suppressor. I like the idea of just sending the tube better though!

The Collar of the Suppressor is the serialized part and cannot be easily removed. If the suppressor reaches the end of it's lifecycle, you have a baffle strike, or if there is a manufacturing defect with the tube/baffles, you can send it back to us and we can remove the tube and put a new one on the mounting collar.

[jpmuscle]

The Collar of the Suppressor is the serialized part and cannot be easily removed. If the suppressor reaches the end of it's lifecycle, you have a baffle strike, or if there is a manufacturing defect with the tube/baffles, you can send it back to us and we can remove the tube and put a new one on the mounting collar.

Ok, great. But it's not end user configurable which would be nice.

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk