Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: BCM BCG in my 6920..

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    13,140
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    I dropped a new bolt in with a barrel the other day, both known good components from good companies. Guess what? THEY DID NOT FUNCTION PROPERLY.

    Lots of people like to say it doesn't matter, but the simple truth is that factually it does matter. The odds are there won't be a problem, but that doesn't mean it won't happen.
    Stick


    Board policy mandates I state that I shoot for BCM. I have also done work for 200 or so manufacturers within the firearm community. I am prior service, a full time LEO, firearm instructor, armorer, TL, martial arts instructor, and all around good guy.

    I also shoot and write for various publications. Let me know if you know cool secrets or have toys worthy of an article...


    Flickr Tumblr Facebook Instagram RECOILMAGAZINE OFF GRID RECOIL WEB

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Flyover Country
    Posts
    751
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Stickman View Post
    I dropped a new bolt in with a barrel the other day, both known good components from good companies. Guess what? THEY DID NOT FUNCTION PROPERLY.

    Lots of people like to say it doesn't matter, but the simple truth is that factually it does matter. The odds are there won't be a problem, but that doesn't mean it won't happen.
    Absolutely agree. No rifle or component, from any company, can be christened GTG until it's actually been verified. Preferably with at least a few hundred rounds if it might be pressed into defensive service.

    However, in the context of this thread, was it actually a headspacing issue that you'd encountered? I've seen plenty of examples with known brands that experienced issues out of the box with FTEs and FTFs. But, reports of problems with headspacing seem to be exceedingly rare. My go-to gunsmith sees quite a few ARs come through his shop. Recently I had him check the headspacing on a new rifle, and he remarked about not being able to even remember the last time he'd come across a rifle that didn't pass the gauge tests.
    "I actually managed to figure this one out: you've got to find a woman who loves God more than she loves you -- albeit just barely."

    -Army Chief

    I did not know the man quoted above, and joined this Forum after his passing. He seemed to be a leader of men; both spiritually and physically. Someone we'd all be proud to emulate.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Va
    Posts
    634
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Stickman View Post
    I dropped a new bolt in with a barrel the other day, both known good components from good companies. Guess what? THEY DID NOT FUNCTION PROPERLY.

    Lots of people like to say it doesn't matter, but the simple truth is that factually it does matter. The odds are there won't be a problem, but that doesn't mean it won't happen.
    The key is that odds are you will be fine. Ideally it is best to check headspace on the bolt. I'd personally leave the colt bolt in the gun and just swap carriers if I didn't have headspace gauges to check.

    Edit: I can't think of the last time I've personally seen headspace issues with quality parts(new) although I'm not an armor. I've just helped multiple friends with their guns. I'm sure someone that is a gunsmith would see it far more often although even then I'm guessing most are fine.
    Last edited by ccosby; 05-15-17 at 01:33.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    The Left Coast
    Posts
    1,450
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Everyone says they're GTG without checking the head space, but I'm just kind of weird about these things. I don't worry as much about BCM with BCM (I guess I should), but most of the time I just use a 'Colt Field Gauge' (Brownnell's sells them) to check that what ever I'm putting together is not too sloppy. I makes me feel better anyway.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    72
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I had a similar concern a while back .

    I have a Colt 6920 that had a tiny hole develop on the flat
    part of the bolt face between the firing pin hole and the bolt lugs .

    It wasn't all the way through but it was definitely noticeable .
    It looked like there almost had to have been an air pocket or something
    in it when it was made . It didn't appear to be corroded out .
    It wasn't originally there so I wonder if perhaps the coating filled the
    hole and came out after use .
    It was past Colt's 1 year warranty at that time so I bought a BCM
    bolt and threw it in there .

    I researched and at the time everyone said that was OK .

    Maybe that sounds OCD to replace it but for $65 I thought it was better
    safe then to loose a digit or an eye .

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    3,102
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cobrasks View Post
    I had a similar concern a while back .

    I have a Colt 6920 that had a tiny hole develop on the flat
    part of the bolt face between the firing pin hole and the bolt lugs .

    It wasn't all the way through but it was definitely noticeable .
    It looked like there almost had to have been an air pocket or something
    in it when it was made . It didn't appear to be corroded out .
    It wasn't originally there so I wonder if perhaps the coating filled the
    hole and came out after use .
    It was past Colt's 1 year warranty at that time so I bought a BCM
    bolt and threw it in there .

    I researched and at the time everyone said that was OK .

    Maybe that sounds OCD to replace it but for $65 I thought it was better
    safe then to loose a digit or an eye .
    I thought that Colt bolts were supposed to be MPI inspected. Sure doesn't look like your's was.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Flyover Country
    Posts
    751
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by georgeib View Post
    I thought that Colt bolts were supposed to be MPI inspected. Sure doesn't look like your's was.
    MPI only matters if the person doing the testing catches the flaw. And that's assuming it was actually present during the test.

    What I'm more surprised with is that everyone told him it was OK. Is a hole developing in the bolt face so common that it's been proven to be of little consequence?

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •