Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 28

Thread: Delete

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,797
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Torquetard View Post
    Salient point, but

    Any length- piston
    Suppressed- piston
    Loud- piston
    Semi auto- piston
    FA- piston
    Range toy- piston
    Duty- piston
    Bum****ery.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    74
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    This. Aside from the M27 at the Corps and 416 over at SOCOM/JSOC I highly doubt it. Hell, H&Ks early selling point was 'you can just buy the upper and put it on your existing lower' and God only knows how many M16Ax, M4 and M4A1s are in the DOD system. I know in a recent study (by SOCOM I believe) they were looking to see if the benefits were worth it. There's also a study to see if they want to potentially move to midlength gas systems vs carbine for the M4A1+ or whatever they're calling it. Other studies are researching suppressors, ammo selection (MK262, MK318, M855A1 etc).
    Regardless, the cost alone would probably prevent a complete switch unless something miraculous comes around.

    On the other hand, the M9 is aging and was due for a replacement. It's not a knock against them, they've *mostly* held up extremely well in the past 30+ years but seeing one that shines from the finish wearing off is more common than not these days and many are rapidly approaching their end of life. For the cost of a replacement unit it makes sense that they decided to look at what is new and better since the adoption of the M9, most of which are likely cheaper. Not saying the 320 was necessarily the best choice, but the modular nature could work out for multiple roles.
    Quote Originally Posted by Wake27 View Post
    Definitely not. The Marine infantry is CONSIDERING issuing M27 IARs to everyone. But that's it.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Midwest Flyover Country
    Posts
    3,742
    Feedback Score
    0
    deleted
    Last edited by RetroRevolver77; 12-18-18 at 18:34.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Jefferson,NC
    Posts
    324
    Feedback Score
    11 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by eodinert View Post
    Except nobody says that.

    On HK pro, they say 'How do I get my 10.5 inch HK to run suppressed?'...then have 5 different gas blocks over the years to try and get them to run with/without suppressors.
    HK has the A5 versions with adjustable gas blocks. As far as HK Pro, most have an MR556 with 16" barrel cut down to a 10.4" and try to run a 14.5"/16" gas block. HK made a variety of gas blocks, the vented 16"/14.5", the vented 10.4" , the non-vented 10.4", and now the adjustable on the 416A5. The guns run like a champ from HK. It is truly when people reconfigure them they aren't as reliable. I cannot vouche for most other piston guns. I owned a Sig 516 gen 2 and it was workhorse. I currently own a complete HK MR556 and a 416 upper. Both are what you expect from HK, boringly reliable. I don't see the military buying HK rifles, but I think the M4 is going to be replaced in the next decade or so.
    Last edited by CharlieDeltaJuliet; 05-22-17 at 16:58.
    Owner of Carolina Laser Works
    https://carolinalaserworks.ecwid.com

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    262
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by eodinert View Post
    Except nobody says that.

    On HK pro, they say 'How do I get my 10.5 inch HK to run suppressed?'...then have 5 different gas blocks over the years to try and get them to run with/without suppressors.
    With all due respect, your statement is a bit misleading. To add to CDJ's post, the real deal 416's don't have the issues you're referencing from HKPRO. I can't speak for the MR556 frankenguns some people try to build, but the select fire guns are a different story. My first hand exposure with 10.4" guns and SF cans has led me to conclude that aside from being a bit on the gassy side, they are very reliable with / without a can. The A5 variants are supposed to further address that. You run into issues when folks try to cut down a barrel with a certain sized gas port and expect a gas block intended for another barrel length / port size to work.

    Do I think the next service rifle to replace the M4 in any branch will be the 416 / M27? No. Do I think the next service rifle will be a direct impingement gun? Also no.


    Tspeis
    Last edited by Tspeis; 05-22-17 at 14:52.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    19
    Feedback Score
    0
    I wish HK would release one with a chrome lined barrel in upper or rifle form.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Jefferson,NC
    Posts
    324
    Feedback Score
    11 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by F22raptor View Post
    I wish HK would release one with a chrome lined barrel in upper or rifle form.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    You and me both!
    Owner of Carolina Laser Works
    https://carolinalaserworks.ecwid.com

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    CDA
    Posts
    4,815
    Feedback Score
    13 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by F22raptor View Post
    I wish HK would release one with a chrome lined barrel in upper or rifle form.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Quote Originally Posted by CharlieDeltaJuliet View Post
    You and me both!
    That makes 3 of us just in these last few posts. I really, really want an HK 416 SBR.
    98% Sarcastic. 100% Overthinking things and making up reasons for buying a new firearm.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    501
    Feedback Score
    0
    A 11.5 hk 416 upper... yes please

    Chrome lined yes please

    Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Bora Bora
    Posts
    6,097
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tspeis View Post
    With all due respect, your statement is a bit misleading. To add to CDJ's post, the real deal 416's don't have the issues you're referencing from HKPRO. I can't speak for the MR556 frankenguns some people try to build, but the select fire guns are a different story. My first hand exposure with 10.4" guns and SF cans has led me to conclude that aside from being a bit on the gassy side, they are very reliable with / without a can. The A5 variants are supposed to further address that. You run into issues when folks try to cut down a barrel with a certain sized gas port and expect a gas block intended for another barrel length / port size to work.

    Do I think the next service rifle to replace the M4 in any branch will be the 416 / M27? No. Do I think the next service rifle will be a direct impingement gun? Also no.


    Tspeis
    Which is precisely why my 16" MR barrels are still 16".

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •