ROTC programs can vary an incredible amount. My dad is a Naval Academy grad and did very, very well. I wanted to follow in the academy footsteps but could not be happier that I didn't. I'd argue that my ROTC program and my college experience in general could not have been better, but we had a very good program. Other schools right down the road were completely embarrassing, it really just depends on the program leadership. My ROTC PMS (BN CDR) wasn't too strong but the primary NCOs were, which meant that we were raised between a conventional MSG from the combat engineers and an 18D/18Z from a CIF team (his article about Army marksmanship was posted on here a while ago). Pretty ****ing dope, and I absolutely think the best qualities I have are a combination of what I learned from the three of them. I am forever grateful that those men were my mentors and hope that I always remember what they taught me. All that being said, most of the USMA grads I know are pretty squared away. The opportunities they have really set them apart though. Not a single person from my class got a slot for airborne or air assault while we were in school, but I'm pretty sure they run an AASLT school at West Point over the summer. Stuff like that can help quite a bit in the first few years. I can't really comment on how it relates to their slating and promotion though. What I do know is that the vast majorities of LTs are promoted to CPT, unless they do something really stupid OR are infantry and not tabbed. Those guys have a much harder time picking up rank because a lot of them are not given the one thing they absolutely need for promotion, which is a platoon. Two years for XO is about right, depending on how much time was spent in various schools.
Bookmarks