Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 48

Thread: Aimpoint NANO VS Trijicon RMR

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,631
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)

    Aimpoint NANO VS Trijicon RMR

    We received the new B&T USW in and with it, came the Aimpoint NANO. For those that do not know, B&T requested that Aimpoint make this optic specifically for them (for the USW). Just like they did with the T-1.

    Here are some specs for comparison purposes:

    NANO:

    Window width: 16mm
    Window height: 13mm

    Body width: 1.2
    Body Height: 1.1
    Body Length: 46mm
    Weight: 3.0oz


    RMR:

    Window width: .917
    Window height: .687

    Body width: 1.133
    Body Height: .953
    Body Length: 44.76mm


    Additional specs on the NANO:

    NV compatible
    1 click = 1" @ 100yds
    Dot size: 4MOA
    Dot intensity: 10 manually adjusted settings
    Battery Type: CR1225 Lithium
    Battery Life: 1 year of use at position 6
    Materials: High strength aluminum, hard anodized, black to dark gray,
    non-glare finish
    Temp range: -40F to +160F
    Water resistant: Submersible to 16ft
    To turn on: Press + or - (intensity always starts off at level 7)
    To turn off: Press -




    C4
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by C4IGrant; 06-14-17 at 11:45.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    39
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    To me it seems that there are no real Advantages to the NANO over the RMR. Unless the NANO is a sealed beam unit, is that the case?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,631
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ajackz View Post
    To me it seems that there are no real Advantages to the NANO over the RMR. Unless the NANO is a sealed beam unit, is that the case?
    We will need to wait and see run time, etc before we would make conclusions, but the two main advantages that we can see is that you do not need to remove the opic to install a new battery and the lens does not have the blue tint to it. Theres are two issues that seem keep people from buying the RMR.


    C4

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    39
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Looking forward to your opinions on it. It its safe to assume that these will be on your site and if so do you know what these will be selling for? If prices are comparable i could certainly see someone going to the the NANO based on those two features.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,631
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ajackz View Post
    Looking forward to your opinions on it. It its safe to assume that these will be on your site and if so do you know what these will be selling for? If prices are comparable i could certainly see someone going to the the NANO based on those two features.
    The NANO really isn't even acknowledged by Aimpoint yet LOL. So at best, we will see it at the 2018 shot show.


    C4

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    E. Tennessee
    Posts
    2,368
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    Thank you for putting up the pictures and some details about the Nano. I would be interested to see a pic looking through both sights side-by-side.
    ETC (SW/AW), USN (1998-2008)
    CVN-65, USS Enterprise

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    CDA
    Posts
    4,815
    Feedback Score
    13 (100%)
    I saw this right after your IG post last night. Great photos again!
    98% Sarcastic. 100% Overthinking things and making up reasons for buying a new firearm.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,631
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by hotrodder636 View Post
    Thank you for putting up the pictures and some details about the Nano. I would be interested to see a pic looking through both sights side-by-side.
    That is somewhat hard as the NANO is mounted. Still adding info from the manual so check back.


    C4

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,631
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by WickedWillis View Post
    I saw this right after your IG post last night. Great photos again!

    Thanks.

    C4

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,631
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    So when you power the NANO on, it defaults to position 7. It is a full sunny day today. Looking at a target in the sun, this illumination setting is barely bright enough to see the dot. Position 8 and or 9 are more ideal.


    C4

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •