Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Out-of-the-box accuracy

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,081
    Feedback Score
    0

    Out-of-the-box accuracy

    It appears (from listening to various people on the subject) that HK and CZ are close to the top of the heap when it comes to out-of-the-box accuracy. Is it tighter lockup, closer tolerances, or some other factor?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Central NY
    Posts
    1,538
    Feedback Score
    81 (100%)
    Hammer Forged barrel helps I'm sure ! Could be a mix of closer tolerances in the right spots also. I'm no expert but just a couple of my thoughts.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,631
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Slater View Post
    It appears (from listening to various people on the subject) that HK and CZ are close to the top of the heap when it comes to out-of-the-box accuracy. Is it tighter lockup, closer tolerances, or some other factor?
    The lockup between the barrel hood and slide is where it really matters the most for Glock's, M&P's, HK's, CZ, Walthers, etc. For me, I would NEVER buy a pistol that I couldn't measure the lockup (with a feeler gauge) first. With that said, I have never seen an inaccurate HK or CZ.


    C4

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    3,485
    Feedback Score
    58 (100%)
    Please clarify "measure lockup (with a feeler gauge)".
    How do you do this?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,631
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by gaijin View Post
    Please clarify "measure lockup (with a feeler gauge)".
    How do you do this?
    Remove the slide from the pistol. Remove the guide rod assembly. Hold the barrel in place (pulling it down ward so it rests against the front of the slide). Take the feeler gauge and place it between the hood and breech face of the slide. Keep changing the size of the feeler gauge until you can kit it between the two.

    Ideally, you want something UNDER .003 on the feeler gauge.


    C4

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    New Mexico, USA
    Posts
    740
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    I have a 1988 West German P226 that rattles like a tin can full of rocks. But it's the most accurate pistol I have. I'm gonna have to try the feeler gauge thing out of curiosity.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,631
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by El Pistolero View Post
    I have a 1988 West German P226 that rattles like a tin can full of rocks. But it's the most accurate pistol I have. I'm gonna have to try the feeler gauge thing out of curiosity.
    That is slide to frame fit (which really has nothing to do with accuracy).


    C4

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    59
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Also remember ergonomics. Thats another piece of the puzzle of accuracy. CZ and Hk In my opinion have great ergonomics allowing me to shoot them better.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    2,837
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by C4IGrant View Post
    Remove the slide from the pistol. Remove the guide rod assembly. Hold the barrel in place (pulling it down ward so it rests against the front of the slide). Take the feeler gauge and place it between the hood and breech face of the slide. Keep changing the size of the feeler gauge until you can kit it between the two.

    Ideally, you want something UNDER .003 on the feeler gauge.


    C4
    ETA: Disregard, I'm picking up what you're throwing down.

    Wouldn't this potentially show if a gun was on the high or low end of chamber headspace?
    Last edited by bp7178; 06-22-17 at 00:53.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,631
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by browneu View Post
    Also remember ergonomics. Thats another piece of the puzzle of accuracy. CZ and Hk In my opinion have great ergonomics allowing me to shoot them better.
    Not really. That is more to do with comfort. A Glock (which isn't considered very ergonomic), can produce sub 1" groups at 25yds.



    C4

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •