Page 12 of 16 FirstFirst ... 21011121314 ... LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 151

Thread: USS Fitzgerald Collision (and another: USS McCain)

  1. #111
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,659
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    Thought this article was insightful. Also touches on the apparent condition of the ship in the pics/video.

    http://taskandpurpose.com/fitzgeralds-watch-team-mine/

    The area this last one happened is apparently a very busy stretch of ocean due to geography. Which significantly increases probability of interaction.

    Don't know what really happened. I'm at least a bit suspicious that we have multiple events, makes me think there may be some systematic issue. (Tech or people).

  2. #112
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durham, NC
    Posts
    6,951
    Feedback Score
    23 (100%)
    Another excellent article from Proceedings:

    https://www.usni.org/magazines/proce...re-root-causes

  3. #113
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    4,635
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Is it true that there is no "school" and thus no washouts for new Navy Officers?

  4. #114
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    11,471
    Feedback Score
    46 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd.K View Post
    Is it true that there is no "school" and thus no washouts for new Navy Officers?
    Here's some info regarding training of Surface warfare Officers (SWO's):

    http://cimsec.org/circles-surface-wa...training/24050

    TLR - there was a school. They closed it, and gave everyone CBT's to watch while underway. Bad. Idea. New school starts up again.

  5. #115
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    11,863
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SeriousStudent View Post
    Here's some info regarding training of Surface warfare Officers (SWO's):

    http://cimsec.org/circles-surface-wa...training/24050

    TLR - there was a school. They closed it, and gave everyone CBT's to watch while underway. Bad. Idea. New school starts up again.
    So this was/is the Navy's version of, for instance, IOBC for Infantry officers? While not a Navy guy I cannot believe they would send newly minted officers to the fleet without specific training for being a surface warfare officer. They don't send submarine officers straight to a sub do they? Jeesh.....
    11C2P '83-'87
    Airborne Infantry
    F**k China!

  6. #116
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    CONUS
    Posts
    5,999
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SeriousStudent View Post
    Here's some info regarding training of Surface warfare Officers (SWO's):

    http://cimsec.org/circles-surface-wa...training/24050

    TLR - there was a school. They closed it, and gave everyone CBT's to watch while underway. Bad. Idea. New school starts up again.
    Do you think upper command felt technology was a substitute for standardized training before assigning a surface officer to the fleet?
    Train 2 Win

  7. #117
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    11,471
    Feedback Score
    46 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by T2C View Post
    Do you think upper command felt technology was a substitute for standardized training before assigning a surface officer to the fleet?
    Do I think that some beancounter with little or no time underway thought that? Yep, I bet they probably did.

    Do I think it was a good idea? Nope, not at all.

  8. #118
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Black Hills, South Dakota
    Posts
    4,688
    Feedback Score
    0
    ..... a bit of humor at the 7th Fleet's expense....

    https://www.duffelblog.com/2017/08/n...ntown-houston/

  9. #119
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Durham, NC
    Posts
    6,951
    Feedback Score
    23 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Todd.K View Post
    Is it true that there is no "school" and thus no washouts for new Navy Officers?
    The schoolhouse in Newport has been closed, for years. The Navy in all of its wisdom believed that OJT/apprenticeship-type training was more valuable. It is the way that many of the enlisted rates learned their trade.

    I don't know of a single SWO who thought closing the schoolhouse was a good idea.

    Being a SWO, especially a junior one, is a herd life underway. Every minute of non-sleep time (which is about 5 hours) is accounted for, and the collateral duties are enormous.

  10. #120
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    3,773
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Knew this was coming:

    The military is examining whether compromised computer systems were responsible for one of two U.S. Navy destroyer collisions with merchant vessels that occurred in recent months, Vice Admiral Jan Tighe, the deputy chief of naval operations for information warfare, said on Thursday.

    http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/09/14/...y-cyberattack/

Page 12 of 16 FirstFirst ... 21011121314 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •