DI buffer tuning with supressor and Gemtech carrier?

[tom12.7]

With all due respect Clint, how can a generic device that limits gas admission to the expansion chamber be better than a dedicated port and action mass that could be better tailored for a use? There's a lot of variables involved.
As a stop gap for some? maybe? but is it a better solution?

[MistWolf]

The T3 is a whopping 5.4oz (for reference, T2 is 4.02, and T1 is 3)

5.4 is about how much a rifle buffer weighs. I bet if you try an H2 or H buffer, your AR will function the way you want it to

not switching barrels.

I hope not! From your description of how it functions, I'd say ADCO got the gas port almost perfect. It doesn't need an adjustable gas block or the Gemtech carrier

[tom12.7]

5.4 is about how much a rifle buffer weighs. I bet if you try an H2 or H buffer, your AR will function the way you want it to



I hope not! From your description of how it functions, I'd say ADCO got the gas port almost perfect. It doesn't need an adjustable gas block or the Gemtech carrier

This could be correct, or closer to correct, but at this point, we really don't know. I agree that going without the adjustable carrier or gas block is warranted with normal buffer masses as a starting point is a good idea.

[Clint]

I'm not saying that it is better; just pointing out where it may have some utility.

With all due respect Clint, how can a generic device that limits gas admission to the expansion chamber be better than a dedicated port and action mass that could be better tailored for a use? There's a lot of variables involved.
As a stop gap for some? maybe? but is it a better solution?

[tom12.7]

I'm not saying that it is better; just pointing out where it may have some utility.

Okay, i can agree with that.

[krichbaum]

Nevermind, misread original post.