Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 25

Thread: Larger Threads At End of Barrel?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    1,637
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)
    OK. I know he posts here as Constructor but I had no idea what his actual name is.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    432
    Feedback Score
    46 (100%)
    Keep in mind, some muzzle devices are optimized for a particular caliber (i.e. Precision Armament hybrids). Differences in gas volume and bullet "seal" may reduce the performance for a device compared to it's advertised effect. Also, pretty much every 30 cal device weighs more than it's 22 cal equivalent. Just some things to consider.

    Sent from my ZTE A2017U using Tapatalk

  3. #13
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,114
    Feedback Score
    0
    Bruin's statement is true, but in the past at least, many were more concerned about gas pressure imbalances that can effect precision/ accuracy. They wanted more of a distance from the projectile OD to the bore ID of some devices. Not meaning all by any means.
    To the OP though, the base barrel's manufacturing process has an influence into the degree of this. Also, it is known that reducing thread diameters smaller than the normal ones can magnify this greatly, i.e. 1/2x28 .308 barrels, etc..

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    1,637
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)
    I would love to see some chrono info for two barrels, same ammo, same day, etc with the only variable being the thread sizing at the muzzle end. Some groups too. Preferably the testing would have been done without any muzzle device installed.

    Probably too much to ask for.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,114
    Feedback Score
    0
    Also, without an intent to derail this discussion, but with an intent to expand that if desired. We could look into some differences between having that portion of the barrel in a extension tensile force, or more of a compressive force, and what we would register to for possible MD's. etc..

  6. #16
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,114
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by EzGoingKev View Post
    I would love to see some chrono info for two barrels, same ammo, same day, etc with the only variable being the thread sizing at the muzzle end. Some groups too. Preferably the testing would have been done without any muzzle device installed.

    Probably too much to ask for.
    You'd need a lot more than 2 barrels to get real data from.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    1,637
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by tom12.7 View Post
    You'd need a lot more than 2 barrels to get real data from.
    I got a feeling asking for 2 barrels is going to be 2 too many.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,114
    Feedback Score
    0
    Yeah, it gets complicated more than that.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    N.E. OH
    Posts
    7,616
    Feedback Score
    0
    Before and after threading should give you "a good idea". That should eliminate barrel to barrel variance.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    401
    Feedback Score
    0
    I'd expect it to have more to do with accuracy than velocity.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •