Originally Posted by
Kain
What types of deformation were being observed? I am curious. I know that you can grab a 12 gauge hull, my reloads are a good example, but factory will do this as well, but to a lesser extent, usually. and you can crush the front end enough to make chambering, well a bit difficult. Then again, I've also seen rounds that had been reloaded which actually developed a crease from too much downward pressure, that could chamber fine, though I wasn't too keen on firing them.
On a further note, I have also handled a good bit of loadings that the front end was mushroomed enough that they would not drop into a chamber smoothly, they could be pressed in and fired without issue, and with a manual action it might not even be noticed, but there could be the question as to whether an auto might have a slight issue with said ammo.
Last thought, and a bit of a devil's advocate here, box mags would limit ammo choice to what fits into the mag. While not a huge deal at first glance, I mean 2 3/4 12 gauge should all be 2 3/4 inch right? Not all ammo is, and there were a few loadings, S&B buck I think last year was getting a negative wrap for being a bit too long and decreasing tube capacity, I also heard some ejection issues as well with it. Also, if a loading is too short it might also have feeding issues in a mag a well, issues that might not be seen as much if at all in a standard pump or semi. Granted, vetting your gun with the ammo you plan to use and testing removes these issues, but I think it is worth noting. Still interested in the mag issue deforming rounds. I'd also be curious if a new shotgun round design couldn't improve on that. I think it would be worth discussing, though honestly, don't see a new shotgun gauge or cartridge being developed simply due to logistical issues, but another discussion for that.
Bookmarks