|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Member
Nothing would surprise me. Heck Id venture that folks like Ryan, McOnnel, McCain are also on the list of folks being rewarded for submarining anything Trump tries to accomplish. Maybe those of us who have been saying that its a single party system for years arent the ones in need of tin foil...
Senior Member
Nah, I don't believe that. They do it for free (especially McCain).Originally Posted by TAZ
Jeb and Kasich would definitely want money.
Senior Member
Kasich?! Hell he's just about the worst one. In fact he was just on the news talking about how poorly the WH is run. Not to mention if they did pay him, he is probably stupid enough to announce it on the news just to get in front of the camera again. No, I think Kasich really believes he's a snowflake. They would be crazy to approach him and ruin an already great deal on a free lunch. Every time he opens his mouth it's like they win the lottery. The man is a political fruitcake.
But yeah, why pay for what you already get free. It just doesn't make sense. If someone does have those emails, they are likely fake. Possibly some goofing by the hackers after Podesta got compromised.
Senior Member
Which is why they need to start going after the donor base and expose them. We need to knock over the anthill not just squash the ants.
"You can't stop insane people from doing insane things with insane laws...it's...insane!" -- Penn Jillette
Site Sponsor
I'd be surprised that anyone found it necessary to pay off Fiorina. But wouldn't surprise me at all to find out the DNC was behind the "Stop Trump" movement within the GOP.
It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.
Chuck, we miss ya man.
كافر
Senior Member
I don't know here. This seem, at least from the WL side, easy to chase down- but it doesn't seem to pan out. Now, the fact that these seem to be on the payroll just makes it easy to look at the headline and think "that makes sense". I doubt anything as concrete and traceable as cash would trade hands. That people like Kasch look at this and think "hell, everyone but me is getting paid!" may be true too..
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Member
Nothing more than can't get anything done government, regardless of party, just how the system is built and used. Too many interests to satisfy everyone in order to get anything passed. Tweak to add votes, lose them on the other end. Pretty much everyone is to blame tanking one issue or another.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks