Originally Posted by
HMM
Not trying to argue but do you think a current 8-3 Stanford that's ranked #20 should be in if they beat USC for the conference championship? It is the Pac 12 after all...lol (That's assuming we had an 8 team playoff) Again not trying to argue but it's hard to make a system that's fair, someone is always going to be left out. I think the old system should have been changed to 2-3 play and the winner of that plays #1. But it's really all about money and what the best matchup for ratings will be.
In reality one could argue over however it turns out, someone will be left out and pissed. My Okie Lite buddies are still claiming they could have won it all... The 2004 Auburn team was left out and they could have won it all that year I think and I hate Auburn...hahahaha
It would be the same as in the NFL. Win your division with a loosing record and you are in the playoffs. It is quite simple actually. Having an 8-3 Stanford is no crazier than a NFL wild card team winning the Superbowl.
Much like the 2007 NYG wildcard team beating an undeafeted NE team in the Superbowl
In no way do I make any money from anyone related to the firearms industry.
"I have never heard anyone say after a firefight that I wish that I had not taken so much ammo.", ME
"Texas can make it without the United States, but the United States can't make it without Texas !", General Sam Houston
Bookmarks