View Poll Results: Engraved dust cover, yes or no?

Voters
95. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes they look fine

    13 13.68%
  • No they look tacky

    44 46.32%
  • don't care it's not my rifle

    36 37.89%
  • What dust cover?

    2 2.11%
Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 63

Thread: Engraved dust covers?

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Jefferson,NC
    Posts
    324
    Feedback Score
    11 (100%)
    I have to say, that looks good.
    Owner of Carolina Laser Works
    https://carolinalaserworks.ecwid.com

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,321
    Feedback Score
    0
    I always look at Noveske rifles and think...'If only it had one more Noveske logo on it...'

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Where the wild beast are
    Posts
    941
    Feedback Score
    21 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by 26 Inf View Post
    A better method of relaying syour disdain for the guy you are shooting at might be to wear a CCW Sash with 'surprize cockfag' or 'pork, the other white meat' on it.
    The ultimate must have tacticool operator approved accessory.
    If it comes in hot pink i'd be in balls deep.
    Just sayin.
    Per Ardua ad Astra.
    STS - gone but not forgotten.

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    1,637
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)
    I think they are GAF with the only exception being IF you had multiple uppers configured the same having the caliber engraved on the dust cover would be acceptable.

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    18
    Feedback Score
    0
    I have seen one with an American flag that looks good. Otherwise, no, not my cup or tea.

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    748
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Red paint stripe around the buttstock or handguard should get it.
    Last edited by JasonB1; 10-04-17 at 09:57.

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    1,123
    Feedback Score
    0
    Maybe I'm missing something but I never get my AR's confused with one another.

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Grays Creek, NC
    Posts
    476
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by tehpwnag3 View Post
    Maybe I'm missing something but I never get my AR's confused with one another.
    That's what the last guy that shot a 300 blk through a 5.56 said.........
    DDM4V11 PRO, SSA-E, Vortex viper 6.5x20-44mm
    BCM 16 KMR-A, SSA, EO Tech EXPS 3-0, G-33 magnifier
    S&W M&P Sport II, BCM PNT, Aimpoint PRO
    BCM 9" 300 BLK upper/KAC lower/DD BCG/ BCM PNT/ Aimpoint T1
    Noveske upper/lower/handguard, 20" 6.5 Grendel Bartlein Barrel, SSA-E,Vortex viper GEN II PST 5x25-50mm
    16" BCA .223 Wylde "budget rifle", SPARC AR
    Retired Army Airborne Infantry

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    3
    Feedback Score
    0
    My front hand guards cover the barrel made so it is hard to see the caliber markings. Simple solution and no mistakes


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Grays Creek, NC
    Posts
    476
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Since it was a pain in the tail installing on my Noveske Vltor Mur upper it's staying....

    IMG_9035 by hd_rolling, on Flickr
    DDM4V11 PRO, SSA-E, Vortex viper 6.5x20-44mm
    BCM 16 KMR-A, SSA, EO Tech EXPS 3-0, G-33 magnifier
    S&W M&P Sport II, BCM PNT, Aimpoint PRO
    BCM 9" 300 BLK upper/KAC lower/DD BCG/ BCM PNT/ Aimpoint T1
    Noveske upper/lower/handguard, 20" 6.5 Grendel Bartlein Barrel, SSA-E,Vortex viper GEN II PST 5x25-50mm
    16" BCA .223 Wylde "budget rifle", SPARC AR
    Retired Army Airborne Infantry

Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •