Wouldn't the idea of constructive possession put any title one dealer who happens to sell ARs in both rifle and pistol configurations, as well as accessories such as VFGs etc in jeapoardy of being prosecuted of dealing in NFA items without paying the SOT? I wouldn't think so but that is where the constructive intent/possession argument ultimately leads. Has a Title 1 dealer anywhere been successfully prosecuted for constructive possession? Or does the concept only apply to an end user?
~Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.
Thomas Jefferson
Bookmarks