If it is adequate, and they get more PPH. (Parts per hour, or rate)
Everything is going to "lean manufacturing". At my facility, we are making the same amount of product, at the same or improved quality, with 80 fewer headcount than before. This HC reduction is done through natural attrition, so nobody was fired to accomplish it. Automation is typically used.
I can't speak for the process used in this BCG staking specifically, but that is one general possibility to answer your question.
"I've just got like, this 5.56 okay? And it's 55 grain ball. And everybody I've ever seen shot with it, it dicks them up."
---Clint Smith
Thunder Ranch
Last edited by JC5188; 09-29-17 at 04:21.
They gotta get the rifles to the sub $500 mark somehow.
Last edited by titsonritz; 09-29-17 at 15:04.
Gettin' down innagrass.
Let's Go Brandon!
That about sums it up.
These two threads are awesome. And it reminds me of another question Ive asked, but never gotten a really satisfactory answer to: How much savings in dollers does a gunmaker make from switching from steel to MIM parts? Take a 1911...using whatever parts can be & are MIM, over traditional parts of steel...how much is saved? I DO NOT want a debate on MIMvs. Steel....just wondered about cost savings, period.
The obedient always think of themselves as virtuous rather than the cowards they really are.
Last edited by titsonritz; 09-29-17 at 17:41.
Gettin' down innagrass.
Let's Go Brandon!
Bookmarks