Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 59

Thread: The Vegas Shooter Screwed Us on Deregulation of Suppressors

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    9,936
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by skywalkrNCSU View Post
    This is just a waste of taxpayers money by introducing such absurd legislation. It is obviously just a ploy by the democrats to offset the HPA and has no chance in hell of being passed. It will however probably make the HPA more difficult to pass and will give the left a rallying point.
    Are you saying they couldn't wrap it up in the bumpstock ban and get cuck GOPe RINO's to vote for it? I can think of a handful of "Republicans" who'd vote for it as a stand alone!
    What if this whole crusade's a charade?
    And behind it all there's a price to be paid
    For the blood which we dine
    Justified in the name of the holy and the divine…

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    N.E. OH
    Posts
    7,623
    Feedback Score
    0
    I have a hair-brained theory.

    Ryan shelving is a blessing in disguise. Lots of tension right now, it would probably fail. Shelve it, wait till this BS blows over, and bring it back to vote down the road. Anyone else have similar thoughts or have I lost my shit?

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    9,936
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by MegademiC View Post
    I have a hair-brained theory.

    Ryan shelving is a blessing in disguise. Lots of tension right now, it would probably fail. Shelve it, wait till this BS blows over, and bring it back to vote down the road. Anyone else have similar thoughts or have I lost my shit?
    Most of us can take one look and see cuck Ryan saying "Whew! Thank GOD I can shelve this stupid bill!" : (
    What if this whole crusade's a charade?
    And behind it all there's a price to be paid
    For the blood which we dine
    Justified in the name of the holy and the divine…

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,099
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by glocktogo View Post
    Most of us can take one look and see cuck Ryan saying "Whew! Thank GOD I can shelve this stupid bill!" : (
    While not his intent to help us, we need to realize that the bump fire crap and the tie in to semi autos is the next battle we need to win. If we can't win that, we'll never win Title I suppressors. But if we can get the next "gun ban attempt" shut down, title I suppressors would make a nice follow up.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Florida Gulf Coast
    Posts
    1,432
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ABNAK View Post
    While I don't own any NFA items, if I had a can and they were banned you obviously can't deny having it 'cause they're registered items, so before I turned it over I'd make sure it was made inoperable. Drilling some HUGE holes in it, smashing it with a hammer, etc.
    How about you just not turn it in. How bout dat?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    1,014
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    In a country with 322M people, 300M guns, how many NFA items exist? Is there a statistic/s?

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1,382
    Feedback Score
    51 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by glocktogo View Post
    Are you saying they couldn't wrap it up in the bumpstock ban and get cuck GOPe RINO's to vote for it? I can think of a handful of "Republicans" who'd vote for it as a stand alone!
    I agree, they always add crap in to their bills to "pay-off" the Republicans to vote for their bills. I don't understand why the R's never try the same tactics. Just put ban "bump-stocks but the wording should just specifically be slide-fire"....see what the liberals are doing by calling it bump stocks....trying to include more than what was used. Anyways in the same bill remove suppressors from the registry, then when the democrats vote no, it was the democrats that voted against banning the bump stocks.....see how that works!

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    N.E. OH
    Posts
    7,623
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by VARIABLE9 View Post
    In a country with 322M people, 300M guns, how many NFA items exist? Is there a statistic/s?
    Absolutely. I'm surprised by the prevelance of DD, and the rarity of SBRs.


  9. #39
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    1,014
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by MegademiC View Post
    Absolutely. I'm surprised by the prevelance of DD, and the rarity of SBRs.
    Thank you.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    midwest
    Posts
    8,217
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    I question the validity of the document. It says that there are 2404 short-barrel shotguns registered in Minnesota. Short barrels shotguns have been prohibited by state law since the NFA was enacted.

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •