Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: To "safety" or not?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    NoVA
    Posts
    38
    Feedback Score
    0

    To "safety" or not?

    I always teach students to "safety" during movement. Something that was taught to me early in Special Forces. As I started getting more into competition, my desire to engage the safety became less desirable so that I could become faster. Later, I discovered that it didn't add more time. Here's an example:




    Any thoughts or feedback on engaging the safety?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    2,181
    Feedback Score
    52 (100%)
    If you do not have a sight picture, your weapon is on safe. It does not add any time to manipulate a safety selector.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    21,833
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Outside my lane, but you're obviously well aware that competition is not life and death and no amount of safety use will ever replace trigger control.
    - Will

    General Performance/Fitness Advice for all

    www.BrinkZone.com

    LE/Mil specific info:

    https://brinkzone.com/category/swatleomilitary/

    “Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    9,931
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by GreenOps View Post
    I always teach students to "safety" during movement. Something that was taught to me early in Special Forces. As I started getting more into competition, my desire to engage the safety became less desirable so that I could become faster. Later, I discovered that it didn't add more time. Here's an example:




    Any thoughts or feedback on engaging the safety?
    Watched middle of video with no sound, so excuse me if I didn't understand the drill or hear any disclaimers.

    Seemed to me the shooter was merely shooting rounds, engaging safety, moving laterally, repeat. Very fluid choreography, and I'm sure the shooter demoing would be able to do the process in competition and under stress.

    When he was done firing he gave the obligatory throw head left and right recovery. I think most folks do this because, well, operator. When most folks do the movements at that pace they are looking without seeing. Look with the intent of seeing something, search with the intent of finding something, not just for form.

    That was somewhat off-topic.

    There are many views on safety manipulation.

    For example, in his book, Green Eyes and Black Rifles, Kyle Lamb writes 'It is very important to remember that the safety comes off once you have acquired a target. By acquired I mean you have the target in your sights.'

    Here is my idea on it:

    Our goal is to make the officer constantly aware of the safety and to ensure safe handling of the weapon at all times.

    Throughout this course, officers will be required to activate the selector, putting the weapon on safe, whenever:

    1. Returning to the ready after scanning for additional threats;

    2. Whenever the rifle stock is out of the shooter’s shoulder;

    3. Whenever the rifle will be supported by the sling - i.e. during weapon transitions;

    4. Before any movement from one position to another. This does not necessarily include movement from standing to kneeling, etc. Think of the hard rule as being 'engage the safety if taking steps to another position.'

    Officers will be encouraged to engage the safety:

    5. During weapon manipulations such as immediate and remedial action. (Note: the AR cannot be placed on ‘safe’ if the hammer is forward – as in a malfunction)

    6. Consider engaging the safety whenever reloading. As noted above the safety on an AR cannot be engaged if the hammer is forward, so this is an additional check to make sure the weapon is functional and needs to be reloaded rather than a stoppage remediated.

    7. THE SAFETY SHOULD BE DISENGAGED AS THE OFFICER BRINGS THE WEAPON INTO FIRING POSITION AND THE SIGHTS ARE ACQUIRED.


    This seems consistent across the board when taken in the context of universal safety rules, and current instruction on manipulating pistol safeties on LE pistols so equipped.
    Last edited by 26 Inf; 10-20-17 at 00:33.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    2,062
    Feedback Score
    9 (100%)
    I read the YouTube comment that likely sparked this thread. I read the comment before seeing the video and thought the shooter was engaging multiple threats at once and was engaging the safety between each. I thought yeah that seems dumb. But then I watched the whole thing and saw the shooter engaging a threat and moving to a new position and thought “that comment is dumb.” He’s working the appropriately.
    AQ planned for years and sent their A team to carry out the attacks, and on Flight 93 they were thwarted by a pick-up team made up of United Frequent Fliers. Many people look at 9/11 and wonder how we can stop an enemy like that. I look at FL93 and wonder, "How can we lose?". -- FromMyColdDeadHand

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    N.E. OH
    Posts
    7,595
    Feedback Score
    0
    I personally take safe off while bringing rifle to eyes, and off when I lower it. If I feel I need a sight picture, the safety is off. I’m no pro- just what I’ve come to believe is a good mix for what I do.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    127
    Feedback Score
    0
    Short answer, safety on...

    Never found the safety to be the speed inhibitor, some folks think it is... Target discrimination, acquiring sights; those are the actions that will determine "speed"... My .02
    " I can't walk with gum in my mouth...It makes it to where I can't breathe"-The Wife Unit

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    NoVA
    Posts
    38
    Feedback Score
    0
    I see that well trained shooters seem to think alike This is contrary to some of the "interesting' comments on the youtube channel.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    2,181
    Feedback Score
    52 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by GreenOps View Post
    I see that well trained shooters seem to think alike This is contrary to some of the "interesting' comments on the youtube channel.
    If manipulating a safety is such a demanding task, then those people damn sure aren't at the level to be maneuvering with a loaded weapon.

    They should spend more time working on the mechanics of manipulating their weapon and less time theorizing on grossly negligent and unsafe firearm handling because they're too lazy to do it properly.
    Last edited by GTF425; 10-20-17 at 19:20.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    12,145
    Feedback Score
    43 (100%)
    And that’s pretty much that.

    Easy thread.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •