Originally Posted by
GTF425
I think we invest too much of our self value into firearms. I'm not saying specifically people on this site, but when I was working as an instructor when I first got out, I routinely overheard students saying things along the lines of "Oh, he's a Glock guy" or judging others for the caliber/construction they carry. There's absolutely no perfect answer in the world of firearm ownership, but I think we can all agree that being safer, more responsible, and better trained is always a better decision than to not be. After all, the gun itself is just a tool, and it's up to the user to determine what it does.
I firmly believe that at the end of the day, you gotta do what makes you happy. I know plenty of gun owners who don't carry daily. For many, it's something they enjoy as a hobby and nothing more. My great grandfather never once carried a firearm off of his farm. My grandfather never carried one after Vietnam, and my dad only owns one handgun and rifle. I myself have very few firearms and have not changed them too radically for the past 4-5 years. And yet, I hear people routinely comment on the "fighting value" or tactical-ness of a firearm setup when they themselves have no concept of what they speak. I'm far more respectful of a man who trains hard with what he has than someone who seeks validation by trying to buy skill.
I settled on the relatively "easy button" Glock 9mm because it was easy for me to learn to shoot well, had a ton of aftermarket support, and was affordable for a single E-4 to buy and shoot frequently. As I've come to shoot more and receive higher quality training, I've realized that I'm happy with my choice and have no need to change anything. I like to keep things simple, and I'm so heavily invested in the Glock that it wouldn't make much sense for me to leave it. I'm ultimately the limiting factor to how well it shoots, and I don't feel limited by the handgun I carry.
I've shot friends VP9s (fantastic) and M&Ps (liked it with an Apex trigger), have owned a well tuned 1911, and was fortunate enough to have exposure to a variety of domestic and foreign produced service handguns at different points over the last few years. As other posters have said: get training, learn your weapon, and use objective reasoning when determining what to upgrade on your weapon to better fill your needs.
As for why the Glock 19 is what it is: looking at it objectively, it's a relatively light weight, compact, easy to shoot handgun that is reliable, accurate, simple to maintain, and is in almost every significant supply channel imaginable. I feel confident maintaining it on my own and have enough spare parts to last a lifetime. Access to quality aftermarket support is easy, with holster and sight options seemingly endless. You can take a box of 147gr Lawman and shoot a 100 on a B-8 at 25 yards with one out of the box.
It's a great starter pistol to grow on. If you are able to find something that you shoot better, excellent. It's your decision to make, and ultimately, confidence is what you'll fight with. But there's no sense in brand superiority or being a dickhead because "guys overthink it" by not just carrying a G19 or "just being a fanboy" for keeping to what they know is a proven and capable weapon. You could do far, far worse than picking up a Glock 19 and never owning another handgun.
There have been many great posts in this thread, and I just wanted to throw a little in.
Shoot more, be happy. Life's too short to spend so much of it wrapped up in arbitrary bullshit like what gun someone chooses to own.
Bookmarks