Mueller Files first Charges (MUELLER CONTENT GOES HERE)

[Business_Casual]

Here’s my prediction: McCain will take the fall for this in the public’s view. Obama gets off the hook that way and Johnny ain’t long for this world anyway. In return, McCain gets to launder his off-shore money from his arms deals in Syria and the rest tax free and leave it to his heirs. The Deep State is happy and a few minor stooges like McCabe get minimal fines or less.

There is not going to be a big parade of DoJ people going to jail. Mueller will back down, write a report that both sides can say validates their position and the USA keeps heading for the ice berg at full speed.

[RetroRevolver77]

Congressman Reveals The TRUTH about Robert Mueller and Rod Rosenstein During Press Conference.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8VSw-c9CYk

[Coal Dragger]

Watching your delusions get crushed by cold remorseless reality would be amusing if it weren’t for the fact that your delusions in this case would be justice.

[RetroRevolver77]

Watching your delusions get crushed by cold remorseless reality would be amusing if it weren’t for the fact that your delusions in this case would be justice.

You do understand the scope of what happened correct? A coup against a sitting American President orchestrated by top members of the previous administration. This is treason at the highest levels.

[26 Inf]

You do understand the scope of what happened correct? A coup against a sitting American President orchestrated by top members of the previous administration. This is treason at the highest levels.

Coup is a little hyperbolic. Maybe 'government business as usual' would be good.

1. a sudden, violent, and illegal seizure of power from a government.

"he was overthrown in an army coup"

synonyms: seizure of power, coup d'état, putsch, overthrow, takeover, deposition;

More: revolution, palace revolution, rebellion, revolt, insurrection, mutiny, insurgence, uprising

"a violent military coup"

2. a notable or successful stroke or move.

"it was a major coup to get such a prestigious contract"

synonyms: success, triumph, feat, accomplishment, achievement, scoop, master stroke, stroke of genius

"a major publishing coup"

And, even if the allegations turn out to be true, the actions in question occurred before President Trump took office, so 'against a sitting U/S. President' is as much hyperbole as is coup.

Although true hyperbolic statements are generally acknowledged as exaggerations for effect, I believe you actually intend yours to be believed.

[RetroRevolver77]

Coup is a little hyperbolic. Maybe 'government business as usual' would be good.

1. a sudden, violent, and illegal seizure of power from a government.

"he was overthrown in an army coup"

synonyms: seizure of power, coup d'état, putsch, overthrow, takeover, deposition;

More: revolution, palace revolution, rebellion, revolt, insurrection, mutiny, insurgence, uprising

"a violent military coup"

2. a notable or successful stroke or move.

"it was a major coup to get such a prestigious contract"

synonyms: success, triumph, feat, accomplishment, achievement, scoop, master stroke, stroke of genius

"a major publishing coup"

And, even if the allegations turn out to be true, the actions in question occurred before President Trump took office, so 'against a sitting U/S. President' is as much hyperbole as is coup.

Although true hyperbolic statements are generally acknowledged as exaggerations for effect, I believe you actually intend yours to be believed.

Creating fake evidence in order to obtain a warrant to wiretap a President before and during his time in office as well as create false evidence against him to have him investigated to remove him from office- is an attempted coup. There is no downplaying this.

Understand what they had in store for us had Hillary won.

https://www.conservativedailynews.co...stroy-america/

[Business_Casual]

Creating fake evidence in order to obtain a warrant to wiretap a President before and during his time in office as well as create false evidence against him to have him investigated to remove him from office- is an attempted coup. There is no downplaying this.

Understand what they had in store for us had Hillary won.

https://www.conservativedailynews.co...stroy-america/

Curious how that “plan” was sourced? If they can’t even fake a decent hooker story about Trump...

[RetroRevolver77]

Curious how that “plan” was sourced? If they can’t even fake a decent hooker story about Trump...

The plan involved them starting a massive war. You can look into it if you want.



Some interesting new developments, more information about Obama being directly involved in initiating Spygate against Trump.

Thread by @_VachelLindsay_: "1. I think I may have discovered what the DOJ & FBI are desperately trying to hide. It was POTUS Obama himself who authorized the use of […]" #Obamagate #MAGA

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/9...766361600.html



7n6

[26 Inf]

Can any of you refute the information in this article? It pretty much sums up how I feel about the whole deal.

There is no justice in undermining the special counsel investigation

Trump has escalated his latest charge against the FBI to a dangerous new level. He is breaching the normal separation between law enforcement and the presidency to discredit the FBI and the Justice Department. The president demanded that the Justice Department look into whether the FBI surveilled his campaign for “political purposes” and whether and such “demands or requests” were made by Obama administration officials.

This intervention into an probe involving himself and his associates has precedent only in the Watergate scandal. In 1974, the House Judiciary Committee, with bipartisan support from a third of Republicans, endorsed three articles of impeachment against President Nixon, for abuse of power, defying lawful subpoenas, and obstructing justice.

The obstruction article closely mirrors the of actions of our current president, charging Nixon “with interfering or endeavouring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the office of Watergate Special Prosecution Force, and Congressional Committees.” Rather than face certain impeachment by the full House and conviction in the Senate, Nixon resigned the presidency shortly after the committee voted.

Trump’s perceived obstruction appears even more consequential than Nixon’s because the investigation is probing the corruption of our democracy by a hostile foreign power. Alexander Hamilton, the great expositor of American constitutional government, warned that foreign powers, “these most deadly adversaries of republican government,” would seek “to gain an improper ascendant in our councils. How could they better gratify this, then by raising a creature of their own to the chief magistracy of the Union?”

If the special counsel investigation uncovers a coordinated effort with the Russians to raise Donald Trump to the presidency, then the American people must disregard his deflection and demand what Hamilton called the appropriate constitutional remedy of impeachment for such an “abuse or violation of some public trust.”

http://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary...-investigation


The Hill media bias rating is Center.

AllSides rates The Hill’s coverage of Washington news as center biased. This rating is consistent with the website’s aim of offering non-partisan and objective coverage of the capitol. Out of more than 300 community members, a slim majority agreed with our center AllSides Bias Rating™. Among 11 of those who disagreed, The Hill received an average bias rating of 40.9, barely inside the boundary between a center and a lean right bias.

[RetroRevolver77]

Can any of you refute the information in this article? It pretty much sums up how I feel about the whole deal.

There is no justice in undermining the special counsel investigation

Trump has escalated his latest charge against the FBI to a dangerous new level. He is breaching the normal separation between law enforcement and the presidency to discredit the FBI and the Justice Department. The president demanded that the Justice Department look into whether the FBI surveilled his campaign for “political purposes” and whether and such “demands or requests” were made by Obama administration officials.

This intervention into an probe involving himself and his associates has precedent only in the Watergate scandal. In 1974, the House Judiciary Committee, with bipartisan support from a third of Republicans, endorsed three articles of impeachment against President Nixon, for abuse of power, defying lawful subpoenas, and obstructing justice.

The obstruction article closely mirrors the of actions of our current president, charging Nixon “with interfering or endeavouring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the office of Watergate Special Prosecution Force, and Congressional Committees.” Rather than face certain impeachment by the full House and conviction in the Senate, Nixon resigned the presidency shortly after the committee voted.

Trump’s perceived obstruction appears even more consequential than Nixon’s because the investigation is probing the corruption of our democracy by a hostile foreign power. Alexander Hamilton, the great expositor of American constitutional government, warned that foreign powers, “these most deadly adversaries of republican government,” would seek “to gain an improper ascendant in our councils. How could they better gratify this, then by raising a creature of their own to the chief magistracy of the Union?”

If the special counsel investigation uncovers a coordinated effort with the Russians to raise Donald Trump to the presidency, then the American people must disregard his deflection and demand what Hamilton called the appropriate constitutional remedy of impeachment for such an “abuse or violation of some public trust.”

http://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary...-investigation


The Hill media bias rating is Center.

AllSides rates The Hill’s coverage of Washington news as center biased. This rating is consistent with the website’s aim of offering non-partisan and objective coverage of the capitol. Out of more than 300 community members, a slim majority agreed with our center AllSides Bias Rating™. Among 11 of those who disagreed, The Hill received an average bias rating of 40.9, barely inside the boundary between a center and a lean right bias.

That's an opinion piece not a news article. The entire investigation, all of it, from the beginning was based on a lie, a lie that was sold to the media then the American people. There is no way to spin that, none, what the Obama administration has done to the Trump administration is essentially treason, plain and simple. We are at a Constitutional crisis.