Actually, Jones’ divorce lawyer claimed he is “just playing a character”
http://time.com/4743025/alex-jones-i...-donald-trump/
Actually, Jones’ divorce lawyer claimed he is “just playing a character”
http://time.com/4743025/alex-jones-i...-donald-trump/
SLG Defense 07/02 FFL/SOT
He's either an actor or he doesn't possess the courage of his convictions.
He made a choice. If he's not an actor, he's a coward who's a poor judge of character and is all too happy to roll over and sink his reputation, permanently damaging whatever cause he thinks he's fighting for.
If he's an actor, well, then things are straight forward.
" Nil desperandum - Never Despair. That is a motto for you and me. All are not dead; and where there is a spark of patriotic fire, we will rekindle it. "
- Samuel Adams -
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/30/u...mp-russia.html
Supposedly the questions that Meuller has, but the CNN article seems to say that they are actually Trump lawyer questions that they think Meuller may ask based on the topics he wants to discuss.
• What was your opinion of Mr. Comey during the transition?
• What did you think and do regarding the recusal of Mr. Sessions?
• What involvement did you have in the communication strategy, including the release of Donald Trump Jr.’s emails?
I really don't see any questions that I'd answer. Any question that has the words "think" or "opinion" or doesn't contain the words "Russia" I would black line through. That gets rid of 90% of the questions. If I did answer any questions it would be as a press release on these topics and not direct answers.
These are all perjury traps. What evidence of collusion- and more specifically or actual illegal acts. And then say that he has 60 days to wind it down.
ETA:
• What did you know about communication between Roger Stone, his associates, Julian Assange or WikiLeaks?
That's a frickn' tar baby in a briar patch in the middle of a war in Asia question.
Last edited by FromMyColdDeadHand; 04-30-18 at 22:00.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
He should tell Mueller- You're Fired.
Then let them pound sand while he cuts all their purse strings, arrests their corrupt top officials, and demotes those placed by Obama that are causing him trouble.
These aligations about Russian collusion-influence on the election were built so the corrupt officials would stay in place as long as possible.
The entire objective was to obstruction of Trump's agenda as long as possible and to keep Obama's legacy intact as long as possible and to undermine the midterms.
Riding this out until after the midterms are over is dangerous, but perhaps less dangerous than firing all these folks now.
Imagine if Trump uses the HRC rendition of Peter Gabriel's "I don't remember, I don't recall.. I don't remember anything of anything at all."
Most of his answers should be either N/A, Blank, "Constitutional Authority".
Someone needs to tap Stormy's lawyer and find out all the interesting conversations that he is having with Dem operatives....
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Bookmarks