|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Member
Interesting that people will say that the Russians tipped the race to Trump with a few million dollars in play, when there was probably over a $6,000,000,0000 dollars spent over all according to CBS news. The MSM better be careful before someone figures out how much their support of Progressive candidates and causes.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Senior Member
I'm coming to believe Comey and some (but not all) of the others involved were just a victim of their own bias. They disliked Trump so much that they were predisposed to believe the dossier. Or at least parts of it. We cheered when he called the swamp the swamp, how do you think most of the swamp felt about it?
There still are plenty of people who dislike Trump so much they genuinely see this as proof there is there now. Russians, for real. So now we just need to keep digging to get to the part where Trump is directing it / getting paid by them / blackmailed / or a secret Russian Agent.
On the other hand a single grand conspiracy where everyone was working together to get Trump doesn't match up to how everything went down.
Senior Member
I just figure he's a victim of his own ego and hubris.Originally Posted by Todd.K
What if this whole crusade's a charade?
And behind it all there's a price to be paid
For the blood which we dine
Justified in the name of the holy and the divine…
Senior Member
Trump may not be good for ‘democracy’, but he was a hell of a lot better than the other choices on the ballot. Trump’s manner is what allows him not to be the MSM’s bitch, and it makes him highly polarizing to say the least. That Comey went full bat crap martyr with Trump after being BHO and HRCs legal equivalent of a fluffer is an odd time to complain about the taste in your mouth.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Senior Member
Anyone know anything about Kim Dotcom, is he a player or a wannabe?
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-...asnt-even-hack
UPdate received the following from a friend: He was born Kim Schmitz. He has an impressive entrepreneurial and technical background. He plays in the right technical circles to maybe get the information he claims. At one time he was ranked the number one player among 15 million other on line players in the game “call of duty.”
Last edited by platoonDaddy; 02-19-18 at 10:58.
Senior Member
I saw that KimDotCom stuff now and in the past. I'd like to see a rebuttal of it. I know Kim has an ax to grind with the powers that be. Don't remember where he is under indictment. I always file it under 'too good/bad to be true'. House Intel committee should have him in and let people refute him. He is more believable than the dossier at this point. The 22Mbps upload speed is interesting, but not definitive.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Senior Member
He is an attention whore and nothing more. He has made claims about having bombshell information before if I remember correctly and had never delivered.
Site Sponsor
Yes, that works out to a very reasonable $44.21 a vote.
Our Government, for sale to the biggest PAC, just what the founders envisioned.
Senior Member
What is interesting about his claim: the Russian indictment doesn't contain anything about hacking the DNC.
Senior Member
Is this Russian collusion?
Kennedy's message was simple. He proposed an unabashed quid pro quo. Kennedy would lend Andropov a hand in dealing with President Reagan. In return, the Soviet leader would lend the Democratic Party a hand in challenging Reagan in the 1984 presidential election. "The only real potential threats to Reagan are problems of war and peace and Soviet-American relations," the memorandum stated. "These issues, according to the senator, will without a doubt become the most important of the election campaign."
https://www.forbes.com/2009/08/27/te...l#5fd06806359a
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks