Page 2 of 16 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 160

Thread: Are Lightweight Builds the Pinnacle?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    Posts
    8,741
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Hulkstr8 View Post
    I see it plastered all over the internet, Facebook, guys my own age (just turned 26) -that lightweight builds are better.
    Silly statement without further identifying at what, for what, for whom.

    Quote Originally Posted by jimjc View Post
    Lightweight AR's cost more money to build
    Huh?

    most of the builds require lightweight barrels and most of these barrels heat up quickly and when they do out goes the accuracy.
    Needs to be quantified. Needs a capable shooter to quantify it.

    Quote Originally Posted by Cold/Bore View Post
    No. They are not necessarily better. In fact, the ar15s that people are trying to build super light are probably significantly worse. I saw one the other day that was like 4 lbs. I want to see that thing put through a torture test. Throw it around, throw it in the mud, sand, water, etc., and then see how great it is. Light weight is good, but not at the expense of reliability.
    What about the guns weight affected it's functional reliability?

    Quote Originally Posted by Outlander Systems View Post
    If you want a lightweight carbine it's pretty easy.

    Buy a 6920. Do nothing. The end.
    I like you. Shoot my ammo.
    2012 National Zumba Endurance Champion
    الدهون القاع الفتيات لك جعل العالم هزاز جولة الذهاب

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    OUTPOST 31
    Posts
    10,518
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Outlander Systems View Post
    If you want a lightweight carbine it's pretty easy.

    Buy a 6920. Do nothing. The end.
    You say this but for some reason I doubt you follow your own advice.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SeattHELL, Soviet Socialist S***hole of Washington
    Posts
    8,485
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Bear in mind, this is an FNG take, but... depends on intended role, but a big +1 on balance being more important--I personally like things slightly muzzle heavy but not excessively so, which on a free-float 16" means needing a heavy stock plus additional ballast and thus higher overall weight. (Unloaded, my 16" FF actually weighs as much as two mil-issue M4s straight from FN including bayo, cleaning kit and shipping case. Maybe a little excessive, but... the only things on it that're cosmetic rather than functional are the Keymod covers, the Rustoleum OD paint on them and the dash of trans-red paint on the lower's engraving.)
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    19
    Feedback Score
    0
    Even if you don't want an ultra-light, you should be glad that us ultralight builders are "out there". A lot of high end / cutting edge development (Ti parts, crazy light handguards etc.) has been the result of demand from 3 gunners and the ultralight crowd. I just finished a DMR build that is pretty 'normal' in the receiver / stock area, but has several lightweight parts up front that help make the gun easier to low-ready / aim longer without as much fatigue and with faster transitions...so it's not like light parts are only beneficial for the guys building sub-4lb guns.

    If you care about weight specs at all, the best resource around for selecting parts is the AR 15 Parts Weights Database (PWD). Link...

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...it?usp=sharing

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Lowcountry, SC.
    Posts
    6,246
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    For me, lightweight would mean BCM Kino upper with auto BCG on a regular good brand forged lower assembly. CAR stock and magpul handguard. Fixed irons. If I were rolling my own instead, I might consider a BA Hanson 13.7 with a Mega hanguard and a no forward assist forged upper. Any lighter than those just doesn’t appeal to me.

    Outlander is onto something about the plain 6920. Its amazing how light a plain M4 gets when you remove the Elcan, LA-5, rail covers, and flashlight. And eff a suppressor on a 14.5 in barrel.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    333
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Outlander Systems View Post
    If you want a lightweight carbine it's pretty easy.

    Buy a 6920. Do nothing. The end.
    I think you just won the internet for the day.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    333
    Feedback Score
    0
    IMHO the Pinnacle is an intelligently designed functional rifle that meets the users actual requirements. Meaning the builder thinks through what they want and need and don't just fling parts at it because they look cool or their internet friends tell them to. For example, Lets say you had a requirement for a long rang bench gun. You don't put a 11.5" pencil barrel upper with an aim point micro on it and expect to win matches. You work through the different barrel types and build for max accuracy. Flipping the coin, you don't see many 20" HBARs with 3-15 or 5-20 scopes on entry teams.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Hamburg PA
    Posts
    3,506
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Outlander Systems View Post
    If you want a lightweight carbine it's pretty easy.

    Buy a 6920. Do nothing. The end.
    I will see your 6920 and raise you a 6720.
    "I don't collect guns anymore, I stockpile weapons for ****ing war." Chuck P.

    "Some days you eat the bacon, and other days the bacon eats you." SeriousStudent

    "Don't complain when after killing scores of women and children in a mall, a group of well armed men who train to shoot people like you in the face show up to say hello." WillBrink

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    901
    Feedback Score
    40 (100%)
    There is no free lunch.
    Proper Planing Prevents Piss Poor Performance.......

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    2,177
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Kain View Post
    I will see your 6920 and raise you a 6720.
    There we go.

    I really, really wish I had purchased a rifle with a LW-profile barrel when I was first starting out. I still have yet to make the leap, but it's high on my priority list. The 6720s I've handled are very nice to wield.

Page 2 of 16 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •