View Poll Results: Do you think the forward assist is useless and should be removed?

Voters
93. You may not vote on this poll
  • Remove it, it is unecessary. I have military/law enforcement experience.

    17 18.28%
  • Remove it, it is unecessary. I do not have military/law enforcement experience.

    10 10.75%
  • Keep it, it is necessary. I have military/law enforcement experience.

    34 36.56%
  • Keep it, it is necessary. I do not have military/law enforcement experience.

    32 34.41%
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 45

Thread: Removing the Forward Assist?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    1,637
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)

    Removing the Forward Assist?

    OK so in this thread here -

    https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread...at-out-useless

    People are complaining about the forward assist being useless. I disagree.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,781
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    I have used numerous times to close the bolt quietly. Like any tool, the FA can be abused, I haven't tried to shove a round in when it didn't want to go in. The ability to be abused and misused shouldn't be a reason to not have it.

    It's an often ignored control, many shooters haven't needed to use it. It's true the concave area of the carrier (where the two gas vents reside) can be used to push the bolt close, a forward assist is a lever that is intuitively placed and can exert more force than a finger pushing on a smooth part of the carrier, which usually gets fouled with carbon and lube, making that area even slicker. The concave / recessed area exists to accommodate the dust cover's spring loaded ball bearing housing, this was confirmed in my email exchange with Chris Bartocci.

    Military rifles see harsher environments than in civilian (including LE) hands. M16's forward assist was copied and implemented on other systems, which either feature a purpose built push lever like the M16 forward assist, or have bolts that can act like one.

    I vote to keep it.
    Roger Wang
    Forward Controls Design
    Simplicity is the sign of truth

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Anna, TX
    Posts
    3,427
    Feedback Score
    23 (100%)
    I asked Pat Mac his opinion of the FA in a class a couple of years ago. He thought it was a good enough question that he stopped the entire class and had everyone gather around to explain the question that had been asked and to answer it. Long story short, he feels it absolutely needs to be there and routinely uses it as a means of ensuring his rifle is fully back in battery after doing a press check. Also here's a video of KD4 doing the exact same thing.



    I'm not an expert but I take their word for it.
    Steve

    Disclaimer: I am employed by Shadow Systems. My posts on this site are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    4,383
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    Absolutely required on a serious use weapon - for gamer / bubba home builds / bros who only shoot off a bench, who cares.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    suburbs of Philly Pa
    Posts
    6,189
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Irrelevant if you don't want one
    Last edited by Arik; 12-10-17 at 19:24.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Phoenix, Az
    Posts
    4,381
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Absolutely useful. I chamber check anytime I can during a serious situation. A couple whack on the forward assist ensures it's fully chambered and locked.
    C co 1/30th Infantry Regiment
    3rd Brigade 3rd Infantry Division
    2002-2006
    OIF 1 and 3

    IraqGunz:
    No dude is going to get shot in the chest at 300 yards and look down and say "What is that, a 3 MOA group?"

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    13,549
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    On a 5.56, absolutely useful.

    No reason not to have it

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    3,518
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    The forward assist should be retained, but moved forward and streamlined to keep it free of the charging handle.
    Black River Tactical
    BRT OPTIMUM Hammer Forged Chrome Lined Barrels - 11.5", 12.5", 14.5", 16"
    BRT EZTUNE Preset Gas Tubes - PISTOL, CAR, MID, RIFLE
    BRT Bolt Carrier Groups M4A1, M16 CHROME
    BRT Covert Comps 5.56, 6X, 7.62

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    400
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Clint View Post
    The forward assist should be retained, but moved forward and streamlined to keep it free of the charging handle.
    I like Duffy's LPFA for this very reason-- keeps the FA to a minimal profile and it's a blessing to rack those ambi charging handles without it getting in the way.
    If plan A didn’t work, the alphabet has 25 more letters.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    N.E. OH
    Posts
    7,615
    Feedback Score
    0
    I couldn’t care either way.
    My current guns have one.

    I don’t press check, I mag check after loading.
    If a round fails to seat letting the bolt fly, a new round would get chambered, or the situation gets investigated.
    Closing the bolt with the FA does not seem much quieter than letting the bolt fly. If hunting I load up first and put on the safety.

    So for me, it’s been useless, but I don’t mind it being there. I don’t have delusions that the way I do things are the best for everyone or the only way to do it.

    Quote Originally Posted by EzGoingKev View Post
    During military service.

    We shot old and worn out weapons. To my knowledge nothing was tracked and there was no maintenance schedule. Magazines were old with metal or black followers. Combine that with being out in the wood in the rain all day, being out in the freezing cold with snow, or being blasted by sand getting on or off a helicopter in the field. It is a little different than taking your one owner, low round count Colt 6920 out of the safe and going to the range to shoot brand new Magpul mags.


    I started a poll here -

    https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread...Forward-Assist

    We can see how people vote.
    From the other thread- it sounds like your experience is using the FA as a bandaid for out of spec parts (worn springs) or proper maintenance. You still haven’t detailed a situation that it was beneficial, nor has anyone(unless I missed it). I’m not being argumentative, genuinely curious as people I respect are saying it’s a “must have”, but I’m not grasping the “why” and really would like to understand. Sure it’s a tool in the toolbox,but seems easy enough to work around... or is it just that simple that they’d rather it be there?
    Last edited by MegademiC; 12-10-17 at 21:23.

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •