Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Springfield Armory’s 911 Pistol

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,631
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)

    Springfield Armory’s 911 Pistol

    In November, I wrote up a brief overview of the new Springfield Armory AR’s that were introduced at a writers event in Vegas (https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread...istol-and-Edge). There were several other firearms there as well, but we had a gag order until now. While all of the new firearms were nice, especially the TRP’s in 10mm and 6.5 CM M1A, the one that caught my eye the most was their new .380 ACP pistol called 911. Now, when I say “caught my eye,” what I really mean, and thought at that moment, was: Ugh, a 1911 micro pistol in a caliber I hate and with a silly name!” I will honestly state that as a gun dealer, I avoid stocking these little pocket pistols like the plague. Most of my experience with them comes via Kimber and SIG (neither of which should be deemed as overly reliable or fun to shoot). How am I going to write anything constructive or even remotely positive about a gun that I simply don’t want to shoot, I thought to myself.

    At first glance, I was impressed with the fit and finish of the gun. It was well done and the G10 green grips (made by Hogue) really make the 911 stand out. The other nice feature that I am a fan of is the sights. Ameriglo PRO-GLO front (with Tritium insert) and a U notch rear (also with Tritium inserts). The pistol is 5.5 inches in length and less than 4 inches in height. The front strap and main spring housing are configured in Springfield’s “Octo-Grip” texturing (subtle, but effective). Barrel length is 2.7 inches with a full length guide rod and flat wire spring. Two mags come with this pistol (6rd flush and 7rd extended). The 911’s frame is made from 7075 T6 anodized aluminum and slide is made out of stainless steel (either matte finished or black Nitrided). Full MSRP is $599 for the non-laser model. Projected street price will be a lot lower, I think.

    As mentioned above, I am not a fan of .380. It tends to be less reliable than 9mm and features a snappier recoil pattern. So I assumed a fun day of “clearing malfunctions” was on my to do list. This wasn’t the case. First shooting impressions were simply awesome! The thumb safety was 100% usable and easy to manipulate (not a common thing with micro 1911’s). The trigger was a crisp 5lbs with a short take up and reset. Slide release and mag release were also easy to use. After firing a couple mags from this gun, I had to finally admit that I was having a good time. Such a good time, in fact, that I kept coming back to this pistol over and over to get more rounds down range with it. Pretty soon, I was doing 7rd mag dumps (with all the brass in the air at the same time) all the while getting center mass hits. The words “controllable recoil” do not do this pistol justice. It is by far the softest shooting .380 micro pistol I have ever fired (much more so than the Glock 42, if that tells you anything). This gun was also a crowd favorite with the other writers as well. So much so that I would guesstimate that we shot more .380 than 45, 10mm, or 9mm. That should tell you a lot. As the day wore on, I began looking for farther and farther targets to engage and pretty quickly settled on shooting an IPSC size steel target at 100yds. Surely, one cannot hit a target that small with a .380 with a 2.7” barrel right? Wrong. We were able to repeatably put rounds on steel with this little pistol. Impressive to say the least.

    Looks like I just found a new micro 1911 .380 to offer to my customers.

    http://www.springfield-armory.com/products/911-380-acp/

    C4



    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Last edited by C4IGrant; 01-01-18 at 10:13.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    400
    Feedback Score
    0
    This looks very interesting, thanks for sharing! Since this pistol shares design features of 1911s, would you say it would also require similar attention maintenance wise? In comparison to a G42?
    If plan A didn’t work, the alphabet has 25 more letters.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,631
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by bad aim View Post
    This looks very interesting, thanks for sharing! Since this pistol shares design features of 1911s, would you say it would also require similar attention maintenance wise? In comparison to a G42?
    Glocks have less parts so are generally going to require less maintenance. With that said, I view the 42 as the least reliable Glock made.


    C4


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Hamburg PA
    Posts
    3,506
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I'll say this. MSRP is right. Street price should be good. I have no use for it, but hey if it works I can respect it.
    "I don't collect guns anymore, I stockpile weapons for ****ing war." Chuck P.

    "Some days you eat the bacon, and other days the bacon eats you." SeriousStudent

    "Don't complain when after killing scores of women and children in a mall, a group of well armed men who train to shoot people like you in the face show up to say hello." WillBrink

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,350
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    I like this gun. I just cant get past the .380 caliber. Im in for 1 if Springfield builds something similar in 9mm

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Republic of Texas near San Antonio
    Posts
    1,449
    Feedback Score
    0

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,350
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    The emp is a $1000 pistol and more closely resembles the 1911 . The 911 is more affordable and seems to depart a bit more from the 1911 pattern

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,392
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    Nothing to do with the firearm itself, but the ad. Maybe it is just me, but I expect simple errors to be rectified before being published. I would surely correct the misspelled word in the second sentence if I was introducing something new. I may be ocd a little, but I see QC issues in the ad. How far down does it go? Not as bad as the HK rounds being insterted backwards, but it just irritates me how one can read articles on news and other websites and have so many gramical errors. It is rare you see misprints in paper, wonder why it is so common on the web? I am no English major by any means, but I would be upset if my website had misspelled words on it. But hey, it happens to even the best.

    Some might remember 556mm instead of 5.56mm.....

    Rant over, I think it looks like a pretty good .380. Has to be if it got a stock number from Grant.
    Last edited by 1_click_off; 01-02-18 at 12:18. Reason: Correct gramical error!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,631
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,631
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by signal4l View Post
    I like this gun. I just cant get past the .380 caliber. Im in for 1 if Springfield builds something similar in 9mm
    Yep. Asked for it.


    C4

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •