Originally Posted by
southswede
During ANY dispute, there are three sides: "his" side, "her" side, with the third side being the truth. The truth is always some where in the middle. The middle ground usually slides to one side or the other. In this case, based on what the OP has posted, I would say the truth in this matter leans substantially towards Irv Stone.
I have no dog in this fight. I'm sure there is more to this story, but it may not make any difference. That barrel looks very bad. Bar-Sto had the chance to make this right, and they did not.
I take what the OP says with a grain of salt. However, I appreciate him posting this information and the pictures. There are too many other high quality barrel manufacturers out there for anyone to have to go through this with one of the lesser ones.
Joe Mamma
"Reliability above all else"
NRA Certified Pistol and Rifle Instructor, Life Member
Glock Certified Armorer
Beretta & Sig Sauer Certified Pistol Armorer
Colt Certified 1911 & AR-15/M16/M4 Law Enforcement Armorer
Bookmarks