Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 43

Thread: Possible Criminal Charges Against Sanctuary City Leaders

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    8,703
    Feedback Score
    0
    Whether or not anyone is actually prosecuted is almost beside the point. Forcing these "rebels" to spend time and money defending themselves in court might result in compliance with the law regardless of any actual "conviction" or resulting court order.

    It's also true that some of the mavericks would ride this to the top of the liberal cred food chain, but the uglier this becomes the more the American people will become angry at the people who coddle illegals. Add to that the continuing stream of illegal alien crimes being reported, and people who support sanctuary cities will end up regretting their stance.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Republic of Texas
    Posts
    4,088
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Glockster View Post
    Whether or not anyone is actually prosecuted is almost beside the point. Forcing these "rebels" to spend time and money defending themselves in court might result in compliance with the law regardless of any actual "conviction" or resulting court order.
    Wouldn't they just spend their city's money doing so? Although, that might not be a bad thing.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    8,715
    Feedback Score
    0
    but liberals want guys like this to bring more to the communities

    http://www.breitbart.com/california/...ed-motherfers/

    they should have a public outhouse with the prison cell being the pit and put people like this in it !
    handcuffed to a chair in the middle so they cant harm themselves and have a fluids IV so they can last at least a few weeks

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Joplin, MO
    Posts
    874
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by kwelz View Post
    First off let me say I do not agree with Sanctuary Cities.

    But I have a question. Would you have the same response to city or state leaders who say they would ignore federal gun control laws?
    In my opinion, this is a non-sequitur or straw man argument. We're talking about an issue where the Fed is completely within it's Constitutional purview (immigration and border security) vs. an issue that is clearly contra-Constitutional (infringement of a right recognized in the 2nd Amendment). There is no paradox here and to try to equate the two is obfuscation.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    3,091
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by kwelz View Post
    First off let me say I do not agree with Sanctuary Cities.

    But I have a question. Would you have the same response to city or state leaders who say they would ignore federal gun control laws?
    Good question.
    Sanctuary Cities are an example of a government body using the resources of its citizens, in some cases resources from a higher level of government, to take care of non citizens.

    I have a different opinion on that than I do one level of government ensuring the constitutional rights of a citizen are protected from another level of government.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Wyoming
    Posts
    1,490
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bubba FAL View Post
    In my opinion, this is a non-sequitur or straw man argument. We're talking about an issue where the Fed is completely within it's Constitutional purview (immigration and border security) vs. an issue that is clearly contra-Constitutional (infringement of a right recognized in the 2nd Amendment). There is no paradox here and to try to equate the two is obfuscation.
    Well put. Also natural law (aka common sense) indicates that a passably civilized nation has a certain right to safeguard itself, similarly to a householder's right to control who does and does not come into his house and what they are allowed to do there. The 2A merely ratifies a natural law based right to defend oneself. Apparently politicians and legislators are unable or unwilling to grasp this.
    Mala striga deleta est. (The wicked witch is finished.)

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SeattHELL, Soviet Socialist S***hole of Washington
    Posts
    8,484
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    When they start charging, I'd like to nominate Ambulance Chaser Inslee and Turd Ferguson of Washington, and Bloody Brownstain of Oregon, to be the first three examples to be made... start at the Upper Left Coast, sweep down it and spread out from there.

    Personally, I'd like to see the WA/OR/CA Democrat parties on the wrong side of a RICO investigation, but... I'll take whatever tools for ending the careers of ambitious schmucks I can get.
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Central New Yorkistan
    Posts
    1,323
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by kwelz View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Coal Dragger View Post
    As satisfying as it might be to see some of these sanctuary city leaders prosecuted, I don’t think it will happen. Nor do I think it is a good idea or a good precedent to set. As kwelz points out what if the issue were a 2nd Amendment issue where your local Sheriff wouldn’t play ball with a gun confiscation program? How would you feel then?

    I think the best bet would be to cut federal funding for localities and states that don’t want to play ball. Then use that money to hire a metric shit ton of new ICE agents, and whatever other personnel are needed to process deportations. Send these extra bodies to these sanctuary cities and states. Then pay them bonuses to be as productive as possible. Build them their own holding facilities.

    Hell have them wait outside local jails to start, plenty of inmates are illegally in the country nab them right as they hit the street. Put the new ICE facilities right across the street from the jail. Make it easy to get an agent there quickly. Use imminent domain to get the land to build the new ICE jails just to piss off the local governments and rub it in.
    Hard to argue with most of this. Hell it would solve 99% of the issues I have with immigration. I don't care about DACA people or the guy who was brought here at 10 and is now 40 and is living a good life. I care about the scum who came here illegally and are committing crimes and harming our country.
    What these guys said.

    NYH1.

    ROLLTIDE!
    NYSRPA Member.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SeattHELL, Soviet Socialist S***hole of Washington
    Posts
    8,484
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by NYH1 View Post
    What these guys said.

    NYH1.
    Ditto. Crims get a free pass to stay as long as they please after borderjumping, and for doing it the right way the girlfriend only gets to stay for brief vacations despite having us willing to take full care of her costs of living... *rolls eyes*
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Wyoming
    Posts
    1,490
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-...195434409.html

    Sounds like they intend to fire on Fort Sumpter anytime now. New Kurt Schlichter novel come to life.
    Mala striga deleta est. (The wicked witch is finished.)

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •