CZ P07 VS Glock 19x

[HeruMew]

Hello all, I am moderately intimidated posting this, as I am leaning one way already, and I am slightly confident I know many will advocate just getting a 19 or 17. The reality is, I am looking to buy something that comes with stock night sights, one way or the other.

Whichever I go with, I will ultimately be carrying EDC once it's vetted.

So, I am considering one of these two options:

CZ Urban Grey P07 (About $504.00)
Pros:
-Ergos
-Trigger
-DA/SA
-Decently Accurate by most standards
-Suppressor Ready and Night Sights
-15 Round Grip Profile

Cons:
-Need extra mags
-Need Compatible Holster
-Different shooting profile to get accustom to.

Glock 19X (About $594.00)
Pros:
-I EDC a 26 Gen4 now / Ergo Profile would be familiar.
-The holster I have works for this already.
-Same Capacity as the P07 extended mags, but will have a 19rd reload.
-Better grip length for meaty hands
-Have extra Gen4 17 rounders.
-Will have a similar profile to the Canik TP9 I carried IWB for a long time.
-Marksman Barrel (The glocks already outshoot me, so this is awesome in my mind.)

Cons:
-Not very tested at the moment
-Not suppressor ready (but made so very easily if I desire)
-Not compatible with my Striker Gadget (would be inclined to pre-order the Gen5 model that releases in February.)

So,

I wanted to try something different, but, now I am debating my choice. I am a youngin', and I have a lot of time to still find something else in the future.

As far as the Striker Gadget goes, I like the use of it as it replicates what I was trained on the most: DA/SA pistols. Oddly enough, I grew up on Hammer Fired, but when I reached gun owning age, I seemed to only acquire Striker Fired.

With that, I leave it to your input. Don't be rough with me, I only get this kind of a cash a couple times a year, and I know I wanted to upgrade to a longer barrel profile. I am confident I can carry both easily, just not 100% confident in which one I should go with. Figured I would ask for some knowledgeable input.

Seeing as a bunch of our members own one of these, or the other, I hope to get a good variance of input.

Sorry for the long post, and thanks for putting up with my indecisiveness.

[YVK]

If you already have a 26, it just makes more sense to me to get a Glock and have a two-gun setup for different circumstances. I have a 19X and I think it is the best Glock I ever had but I wouldn't carry it because of a grip size (but I would carry it over the 17 if 19x vs 17 was the question).

[crusader377]

I would go with the Glock 19X because it is a platform you are more familiar with. Although many of us (Myself included) have multiple pistols across multiple platforms, it is more expensive to maintain a good level of proficiency across multiple platforms because of the different manual of arms.

[ginzomatic]

If you already have a 26, it just makes more sense to me to get a Glock and have a two-gun setup for different circumstances. I have a 19X and I think it is the best Glock I ever had but I wouldn't carry it because of a grip size (but I would carry it over the 17 if 19x vs 17 was the question).

this plus one

[Arik]

Both should be good guns. Your more familiar with DA/SA. You're going to have to buy mags anyway but CZ is a bit more expensive and not typically found in stores, if that's how you buy mags. Holsters are what....$60 +/-. I'd just buy one and stick with it

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

[whatthepuck]

Get the 19x or sell your g26 and buy 2 P07s. I’d go Glock since that’s what I personally prefer, but nothing wrong with a da/sa CZ if that’s what you prefer.

[hopetonbrown]

The Gen 5 Glock 17 and 19s can come from the factory with the Ameriglo Agent sights, which are kinda like Trijicon HDs but better.

If the Gen 5 Gadget isn't out it should be soon.

I think most people struggle with a 10lb double action shot, which explains the popularity of striker guns.

You really need 2 similar guns. Really shouldn't be shooting your carry gun much after you've vetted it with your carry ammo. 1 to carry the other to shoot.

[Chipper78]

If you went with the P-07 you could get a P-09 mag for your spare and have a 19 round reload. My bedside gun is a P-07 with a P-09 mag with a plus two for 21 total rounds, 22 if I topped off. It has been to the range extensively and works great. I went from a striker fired pistol to the CZ and it did take some practice to master, and takes practice to maintain. But for me the ergos are perfect. Either way you’ll have a good reliable gun. If you’re already invested in the Glock platform it might make sense to just stick with that.

[shiv]

You point to the CZ being “suppressor ready”, but so you intend to suppress the gun?

If you do and would need a G19 barrel for the cab, add $150 to the price of the Glock. Then your sights are going to be short, so add another $80. That offsets magazine and holster costs.

I carry a G19 daily and have since 2011 with the exception of a six month period with a VP9. I actually owned a CZ75 P-07 Duty for a short spell and loved it, but magazine and holster cost as well as general logistics of keeping another platform up and running in my rotation made me sell it. I must say, I somewhat regret that decision and have been eye-balling picking up another P07 if one shows up locally.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[WickedWillis]

I have been, as of today, looking at picking up a P07 for something different and because I have always liked them. Plus, this price;

https://www.preppergunshop.com/cz-75...eid=de0279e7a9