Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 63

Thread: Colt going-ons...Co is changing

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Lowcountry, SC.
    Posts
    6,232
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by scottryan View Post
    Sorry Nope
    care to elaborate?

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,075
    Feedback Score
    0
    The current market is so awash with AR's that the casual/entry level buyer might not even miss Colt.

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,279
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    The only thing Colt brought to the party was a high level of quality assurance which was a carry over from their government/military contracts. As documented here they screwed around with their lowers for many years to keep you from using a mil spec upper or bolt carrier or fcg just generally being dicks about the whole thing for no reason. They made good barrels so once they went to small pivot pins and you could slap their uppers on any of the other many lowers that would accept a mil spec upper you could put together a pretty good frankengun. After they lost the mil contracts and started to cater to the lowly civilian market a little they put out some decent rifles, but by then it was too late, they had to share the market with other companies producing decent product equal to or better than what Colt made. If they started out giving the SP1 a push out pivot pin, then add the A1 fences, keep the cost down and produce to market demand the AR world would be very different today. Would Oly or Bushmaster have had a chance to start up if Colt would have provided a true AR version of what they were making for the military? But no they had to pull their PC crap and now in their twilight we have lots of choices that might not have been. So karma is a bitch, they pissed on us for 20+ years, if they go under I won't miss them that much, but they did make a fine M16A1 like I was issued in the early 70's. But I still get pissed off thinking about cleaning the SP1 I bought in 76, that stupid screw.

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    8,703
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Slater View Post
    The current market is so awash with AR's that the casual/entry level buyer might not even miss Colt.
    Sadly, this might be their epitaph. I would love to know the demographics of the average buyer of a Colt AR. It the mean age is over fifty I suspect Colt is doomed.

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    884
    Feedback Score
    12 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Glockster View Post
    Sadly, this might be their epitaph. I would love to know the demographics of the average buyer of a Colt AR. It the mean age is over fifty I suspect Colt is doomed.
    I dunno, but personally after trying a handful of other off the shelf brands and building, I ultimately swapped to Colts. Their reputation combined with my experience with them in the USMC made it a no brainer. I wonder if a large market share is due to guys/gals getting out and "buying what they carried". I think their name carries a lot of weight and time will tell if it's enough to carry them forward. But the one thing they absolutely cannot do is risk quality or start turning out substandard products. They are often (whether right or wrong) heralded as the epitome of AR-15 quality and build spec and I think that is realistically their biggest selling point.

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Atlanta, Georgia
    Posts
    9,603
    Feedback Score
    47 (100%)
    This.

    After picking up a 6920, I have little use for any of the other offerings on the market.

    Quote Originally Posted by sidewaysil80 View Post
    I dunno, but personally after trying a handful of other off the shelf brands and building, I ultimately swapped to Colts. Their reputation combined with my experience with them in the USMC made it a no brainer. I wonder if a large market share is due to guys/gals getting out and "buying what they carried". I think their name carries a lot of weight and time will tell if it's enough to carry them forward. But the one thing they absolutely cannot do is risk quality or start turning out substandard products. They are often (whether right or wrong) heralded as the epitome of AR-15 quality and build spec and I think that is realistically their biggest selling point.

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Lancaster, PA
    Posts
    1,226
    Feedback Score
    0
    When Colt does something to impress me they'll have my money, not unless and not until. Like actually be run by guys like us instead of bean counters, corporate raiders, and stooges and model their business accordingly for a change. If I want to drop coin on a name brand it'll be LaRue, LMT, or Noveske. You've gotta suck pretty bad to have been making what is now the most popular rifle on the market for 30-40 years before anyone else and have companies that started in the last 15 be kicking your butt like an NFL team stomping on pee wees.
    "You can't stop insane people from doing insane things with insane laws...it's...insane!" -- Penn Jillette

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Mid-West, USA
    Posts
    2,821
    Feedback Score
    63 (100%)
    Can anyone else match their production while maintaining their QC?

    I always feel like the next actual shooting war will kick off and they will receive a gigantic order just in time.

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,193
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Early in my AR career, I bought an Olympic, then a Bushmaster, and a pre-Ban DPMS as the AWB was in full effect, but they weren't a Colt. The Olympic was a very accurate rifle, and functioned flawlessly, but it was a heavy barrel H-BAR, and unwieldy. The Bushmaster short stroked, and I could never get it to run reliably. The DPMS was OK, but also had issues. I sold them all, and the day after Sandy Hook bought a Colt LE6920 FDE Magpul Edition. By this time they were branded, as an M4. The fit, and finish is superb, and to me it is a beautiful rifle. It shoots as good as it looks, and never hiccups. It is more accurate than it should be also.

    I sincerely hope Colt continues to make a great AR.

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Wakanda
    Posts
    18,863
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by pinzgauer View Post
    People who are not there then don't understand that. Half moon bolt carrier groups, mags were not that available, unless you bought up beat up Surplus.

    H&K 91s were slightly less to buy, had similar mag availability, and were much more reliable then Colt ARs of that era. Which is how I ended up with a 91 in college. And a close friend had the first car 15 I ever saw. We shot both extensively. You could get cheap German 762 in the green sleeves, cheaper than I could buy 223 until ppmc came along

    I bought my first mini 14 for a quarter the cost of a Colt at that time. And factory mags were almost identical in cost between the two.

    Not saying the mini is as good as modern Colts. Just that back then, the Colts were not what we have now. There were valid reasons the mini became as popular as it did.

    Ace Hardware stores locally sold ruger's including the mini 14, and had mags in the sales counter. Probably 20:1 more retail distribution relative to Colts.

    Then again, the local mall Sporting Goods chain (oshman's) briefly carried both H&K and Colt. Most LGSs could not get the Colts, not that different than what it was 5 to 10 years ago.
    Ahhh memories....

    The above was my childhood. I even scored my first Swiss Army knife (a Wegner) from an Oshman's in the mall. They had a better price than the tobacco / cutlery shop. Before the internet, the average bea got their info from gun rags and guys like Col. Cooper and Mel Tappan.

    Tappan lauded the Mini-14 over the Colt AR for the reasons you mentioned. My dad being a young working class father at the time couldn't afford the Colt and went with the 91. Looking back from today's market it's crazy to think one could acquire an imported HK for less than an AR. He then picked up a couple of Mini's and being a kid I thought they were cool thanks to The A-Team lol. Fast forward to when I was a young man and got married (the first time oops) during the ban I received a Colt MT6731 as a wedding gift. It came with a LW neutered barrel, sans bayo lug, A2 upper, A2 stock, big hole lower with front screw pin, and sear block. I swear, with that A2 stock the thing would have made an ideal boat oar.

    I never drank the 6920 Kool-Aid as I don't have need for a 16" govt profile barrel with M203 cut outs, I think flare launchers are homo and I'm not a clone dork. Prior to the last Obama panic I acquired and squirreled away several 6720s for future generations, to me they are the ideal Colt / kiss carbine.










    Quote Originally Posted by pinzgauer View Post
    I wish I had hung on to mine. Did still have it when the $1 mags and other German surplus were available. I still have the Hensoldt scope and claw mount.
    As late as two years ago I was scoring NIW (new surplus) OEM "paratrooper" G3 five packs for under $5 a mag. These were still in the wrapper with German writing on them and date stamps from the 60's/70's. Now these have even all dried up.

    If you ever want to part with that Hensoldt scope and claw mount shoot me a PM.
    "In a nut shell, if it ever goes to Civil War, I'm afraid I'll be in the middle 70%, shooting at both sides" — 26 Inf


    "We have to stop demonizing people and realize the biggest terror threat in this country is white men, most of them radicalized to the right, and we have to start doing something about them." — CNN's Don Lemon 10/30/18

Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •