Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 63

Thread: Colt going-ons...Co is changing

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    13,549
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    See....Colt was coming back from that slump.

    I buy Colt because I know Colt makes their own parts. If they do this, they are actually validating what the gun shop A holes say "aw they dont make their own parts"

    Just stick to 1911s and ARs. Not hard.
    The Colt Expanse and that outsourced abortion should have learned them.

    I dont want a Colt Glock clone. Or another Freedom Group style lack of quality.

    I mean I have all the AR stuff I need but it seems like I wont be able to name drop the 6920 so easily.

    Oh well, There's always LMT, BCM, and KAC

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    889
    Feedback Score
    12 (100%)
    Any sources? This is all heresay and opinion without them.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Somewhere in the Sierras
    Posts
    2,026
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    They could always bring back the Python and not charge $4k for it. I would buy...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SeattHELL, Soviet Socialist S***hole of Washington
    Posts
    8,538
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Firefly View Post
    See....Colt was coming back from that slump.

    I buy Colt because I know Colt makes their own parts. If they do this, they are actually validating what the gun shop A holes say "aw they dont make their own parts"

    Just stick to 1911s and ARs. Not hard.
    Well, 1911s, ARs and SAAs, with maybe an occasional "Legacy" run of other classics--stick to doing the things that built their brand and doing 'em well. And by classics, I mean faithful repro of original designs, not that back-birth outsourced abortion they called the "Model 1903" that wasn't even compatible with real M1903 parts, maybe one or two "Legacy Line" models a year with regular rotation.

    The other thing that doesn't help is how Colt's been deliberately debt-loaded by its various owners over the years as a deterrent to hostile takeover... don't remember if it was Daniel Watters or one of the others, but one of the oldtimers over at GunHub who's been in the game longer than many of us here have been alive dished some interesting dirt a while back.
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    4,620
    Feedback Score
    19 (100%)
    IMHO they should license the full TDP for all their products to selected quality makers (let's say, BCM), allow/require those makers to have a "Colt (TDP) Inside" sticker/laser mark on their rifles, and just walk away to enjoy the royalties in the company's effective twilight years.

    Most of all I'd like see the Colt 901 design continue at a company with a bright future and the ability to keep operating through up and down swings. LMT would be a natural but the MWS is too close in concept. So BCM would seem a logical fit, especially given that they don't currently have a .308.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Wakanda
    Posts
    18,863
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Trumps fault.

    Democrats are only good for one thing.
    "In a nut shell, if it ever goes to Civil War, I'm afraid I'll be in the middle 70%, shooting at both sides" — 26 Inf


    "We have to stop demonizing people and realize the biggest terror threat in this country is white men, most of them radicalized to the right, and we have to start doing something about them." — CNN's Don Lemon 10/30/18

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Wyoming
    Posts
    1,490
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Colt has been going under since I was a kid, and that’s a long time. I remember when Winchester packed it in, and I was into those as much as my budget (minuscule) at the time would allow. The world didn’t end.

    I’d sort of like to know what earth-shattering kaboom would result if Colt’s went under now?

    John Boyd (and Charles Darwin) had some things to say about that.
    Mala striga deleta est. (The wicked witch is finished.)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,522
    Feedback Score
    2 (75%)
    There's nothing wrong with subcontracting provided your vendors are properly vetted and surveilled. Almost no one makes 100% of components in house and most companies don't mix their own elastomers or own their own foundries...
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaykayyy
    And to the guys whining about spending more on training, and relying less on the hardware, you just sound like your [sic] trying to make yourself feel superior.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    13,173
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sry0fcr View Post
    There's nothing wrong with subcontracting provided your vendors are properly vetted and surveilled. Almost no one makes 100% of components in house and most companies don't mix their own elastomers or own their own foundries...
    I was told about Colt outsourcing their lowers years ago. I don't see any shock in them doing it with other parts, especially if they maintain solid QC and continue to make barrels and a few of the other pieces.
    Stick


    Board policy mandates I state that I shoot for BCM. I have also done work for 200 or so manufacturers within the firearm community. I am prior service, a full time LEO, firearm instructor, armorer, TL, martial arts instructor, and all around good guy.

    I also shoot and write for various publications. Let me know if you know cool secrets or have toys worthy of an article...


    Flickr Tumblr Facebook Instagram RECOILMAGAZINE OFF GRID RECOIL WEB

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,164
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dienekes View Post
    Colt has been going under since I was a kid, and that’s a long time. I remember when Winchester packed it in, and I was into those as much as my budget (minuscule) at the time would allow. The world didn’t end.

    I’d sort of like to know what earth-shattering kaboom would result if Colt’s went under now?

    John Boyd (and Charles Darwin) had some things to say about that.
    Nothing major, just end of another era. Kind of like when SIG changed. It was nice to be able to buy Colt or SIG by name and have a known quantity as far as reliability. Makes shopping a little harder is all.

    Used to be "Get a 6920 and done." Maybe not anymore.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •