So, I have to admit. I am a rifle guy. I love my Sig pistols, but in reality, I know enough to be dangerous. I have basically three pistols. I say basically, because I have more than that, but some are variants of the main theme. First, I am 100% 9mm. Nothing special about 9mm. I could go with 10mm or .40 cal, but somewhere in that middle range of semi-automatic cartridges. I will never be a .380 Auto guy, and revolvers are not my thing, so .38 is out. I will admit, one day I would like a 1911, so a .45 ACP has to be in my future as well. But, I like uniformity of ammo, so I don't have to think about what ammo I am picking up. Right now, I know that all pistol ammo I have is 9mm.

I started life with a Glock Gen1 17, and I also now have a Glock 19 as a carry weapon. Then, I went to Sig. I just love my Sig P226. In fact, I am not sure there is a better handgun on the market. I don't count the Legion, as it is really a P226. I then bought a P320, and love the modularity. To round things out, I also have the S&W M&P full size. I bought a compact for Mrs. Longshot to use, and then a Shield for her to carry. I have not yet gone to the M&P 2.0, as I am not sure what was wrong with the 1.0.

Back to the Sig P320. I am a little confused. This gun was the prototype for the US Army's modular weapon. So, how is the P320 different from the P250, which seems to be the same handgun to me. And now the Army has the M17, and there will be a civilian version available this summer. How is the M17 different from the P320?

Here is a blog on the M17 and video for those who have not seen the M17 Army handgun: https://charliescustomclones.com/blo...t-out-to-larry