Not much they could have done within the law... but You have to look at the context of who is pointing fingers at them.
You have stupid shit like this floating around.. too soon.
"Very sad that the FBI missed all of the many signals sent out by the Florida school shooter. This is not acceptable,” Trump wrote. “They are spending too much time trying to prove Russian collusion with the Trump campaign - there is no collusion,” he added. "
Last edited by Digital_Damage; 02-18-18 at 14:45.
So, we are supposed to give up our guns so that the FBI and local LEOs can protect us from the bad guys who keep their guns.....
I'm still looking to ask a real live gun grabber- If America is so unsafe, why should I give up my guns when the police just proved that they can't protect us?
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Found out Friday that the family the shooter had been living with for the past 3 months are clients of mine. The gun store where the shooter had purchased the rifle legally, is one block from my office and has been close since the day of the shooting. Both the family and gun store owner have been run out of town.
Trump no doubt identifies the FBI as the tip of the Deep State spear (with good reason) and has such a hard on for them that he can't help indulging his natural blurtiveness.
While it is disturbing that the FBI missed the opportunity to get this evil whacko on their radar, I don't see how that failure played a role in the culmination of the kid's implosion.
Listen guys, if being expelled from school three times and not being allowed on campus with a backpack (you know there is some intel behind that), have the police called on you 39 times, have two FBI tips and have the CPS come to visit over a published video of you cutting yourself doesn't get your background check flagged with a "doesn't play well with others', then we might as well wrap it up. These guys are not OG gansters or Jihad's on a mission. They are psychotic people that acted out. To the people that worry that their rights might get infringed on by some kind of tweaking to the NICS database, I think there is a LOT of room here before we titrate down to upstanding patriots.
How did this kid not get a domestic violence flag thrown on him?
This kid had problems and a shitty life. Too bad someone didn't fix him at crappy before he went full shitty.
That and we need to cut the string on the $10million free advertising we hand these d-bags brands.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Uhm. Terroristic threats? He said he was going to shoot up a school? A video online of him cutting himself? WTF else do you need? Seriously? You think he wasn't allowed on campus because he brought too big of a lunch? We had better get a system that flags these people.
Seriously, this throw your hands up in the air and do nothing ain't cutting it. If you want to keep your guns you have to figure out a way to keep them out of the hands of guys like this.
Frankly, if you are on this forum and the PoPo have been to your house 39 times and your making threats that you are going to shoot up the school your ass shouldn't have a gun. That isn't even a close call.
Let's look at it this way, if we had a system in place to catch these assholes, we'd have about 95% less mass shootings. Heck, outside of BLMers going BAListic, we might not have any. Take away the fame motive and the desire of these guys to go out and find guns becomes less of a path for them to follow.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Bookmarks