Page 4 of 11 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 106

Thread: Favorite liberal propaganda after shootings?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    1,571
    Feedback Score
    12 (93%)
    Quote Originally Posted by rocsteady View Post
    Mine is when they throw out a number of the particular type of shooting that there has been in recent memory knowing, or maybe not knowing, that the number is an outright lie. Like right now saying there have been 18 school shootings in 2018 when a tiny search reveals 10 instances where no one injured, 2 suicides on school grounds, and others may have been merely within 1000 feet of a school. But it is used all the way up, or down, to our super, terrific politicians in official hearings and proceedings as if it's fact.
    Dude, get your facts straight!

    We lose 93 Million Americans a day to gun violence!

    You just cant escape a ghost gun with an ability with 30 caliber clip to disperse 30 bullets within half of a second- 30 magazine clip in half second!. That's terrifying!

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    921
    Feedback Score
    72 (100%)
    School security would automatically make schools look like military compounds.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Posts
    4,719
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by fledge View Post
    School security would automatically make schools look like military compounds.
    LOL, what’s the message that would send? You have to go here everyday, but it’s not safe and you could be severely harmed. On the other hand, if you don’t go, we’ll put you in an institution that’s not safe where you could be severely harmed.

    Statists - forcing you to drink hemlock in the city square since 400 BC.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Burpelson AFB
    Posts
    1,084
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Bulletdog View Post
    Well that seems a little Doom-n-Gloom and unrealistic given recent events of the last few years. Look where we are with CCW. Many said that would never happen. Look at the Heller decision. Look who is sitting in the White House and what he says about the 2A.

    Sure we are under attack and always will be, but we've also made some good progress here. No reason to think we won't make more progress, especially considering how stupid our opposition has become lately.
    That "progress" came with more legislation regulating a Constitutional amendment that clearly states "shall not be infringed".

    NO ONE becomes more free by means of a law.
    Up men! Up! And to your posts! Let no man forget today that he is from Old Virginia! - General George Pickett

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Southern CA
    Posts
    2,173
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BBossman View Post
    That "progress" came with more legislation regulating a Constitutional amendment that clearly states "shall not be infringed".

    NO ONE becomes more free by means of a law.
    There are now millions of Americans walking around legally armed in public, and you don't see that as a victory? You don't see that as more freedom than what we had before when those same Americans could not legally walk around armed and ready for self defense?

    I'm with you on the "shall not be infringed" business, but these legal victories are in fact giving us less infringement. You'll get no argument from me if you retort that we shouldn't need "permission" to exercise a God given, Constitutionally protected right, but my point is that we are gaining ground in many instances, and all is not lost.
    "Literally EVERYTHING is in space, Morty." Grandpa Rick Sanchez

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    N.E. OH
    Posts
    7,607
    Feedback Score
    0
    Liberals often use “gun violence” or “firearm deaths” to support an argument... of course gun violence will be higher where they are available. Obviously the tool doesnt matter. And lastly, as i just said in another thread, USA is about max freedom, not max safety.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    21,889
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by MegademiC View Post
    Liberals often use “gun violence” or “firearm deaths” to support an argument... of course gun violence will be higher where they are available. Obviously the tool doesnt matter. And lastly, as i just said in another thread, USA is about max freedom, not max safety.
    Yet no stats on "car violence" as it's not a term anyone uses. If you did, they'd instantly point out it's not the car causing the violence.
    - Will

    General Performance/Fitness Advice for all

    www.BrinkZone.com

    LE/Mil specific info:

    https://brinkzone.com/category/swatleomilitary/

    “Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    33,982
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by WillBrink View Post
    Yet no stats on "car violence" as it's not a term anyone uses. If you did, they'd instantly point out it's not the car causing the violence.
    I think we should have a national discussion on cell phone related murders. I bet cell phones are more represented in negligible homicides than firearms. Seriously, NOBODY needs a phone that operates when they are driving. We got along just fine without them only a few decades ago.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  9. #39
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,422
    Feedback Score
    0
    "We don't want to take your guns, we just want to be like England and Australia......"


    The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.

    It's that simple.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    LA
    Posts
    1,215
    Feedback Score
    0
    Have y'all seen this guy? Can someone explain the "left" handed AR?https://www.facebook.com/10000751336...3503840910042/

Page 4 of 11 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •