I don't know if the 9mm mags would feed .380, and I don't know what could be used to feed .32.
The appeal would be:
-Less recoil from lighter bullets and lighter carrier
-All bullets would be subsonic
Has this ever been done?
I don't know if the 9mm mags would feed .380, and I don't know what could be used to feed .32.
The appeal would be:
-Less recoil from lighter bullets and lighter carrier
-All bullets would be subsonic
Has this ever been done?
I suspect .380 would feed just fine from a 9mm mag, for range toy purposes. I think the only mods necessary would be a shorter chamber, lighter buffer and spring than 9mm.
If the goal is subsonic velocities, in a short enough barrel (check bbti) 9mm 147’s are subsonic, even if not labeled as such.
Last edited by 1168; 03-12-18 at 04:11. Reason: Clarity
Right.
I guess the only benefit would be less recoil, a little lighter, and it would be a little quieter suppressed. (Less powder/pressure)
An MPX would be a wiser path. AR ergonomics, no Blow back operation, no marriage to a weak cartridge.
"What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v
1558323_01_scorpion_sa_cz_61_submachine_p_640.jpg
There's a reason why full sized .32 and .380 platforms faded away.
Philippians 2:10-11
To argue with a person who renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead. ~ Thomas Paine
“The greatest conspiracy theory is the notion that your government cares about you”- unknown.
Bookmarks