There's an interesting editorial in a physics pub written by people with the creds (Mechanical engineers, in Architects & Engineers, etc) to discuss the topic, vs the usual stuff from conspiracy plebs. It's a worthy read that brings up important Qs worth re examining, though I personally do not think those buildings fell from any separate mechanisms from what we already know of. At the same time, if there's legit Qs left and evidence that does not support the early conclusions from people with the creds to do it and passed muster in such a publication, then it's worth noting and considering. Should it be re opened?
End of the day, I think the simplest answer to it it the correct answer: Yes, no modern skyscraper has ever fallen due to fire, but none has ever been hit by a plane full of fuel. Yes, the buildings were designed to withstand it, but plenty of designs don't stand up to real world physics when tested, and these buildings did not. Some designs work in the real world, some don't, and once in a while, you get a perfect storm where a design is tested in such a way it exposes specific design flaws, and people die. Much is learned from it however, and life drives on. The shear logistics of placing controlled explosives in both those buildings, and then timing that to the planes crashing, etc etc is just not realistic in my view, even if it was not all done in total secret.
The conclusion:
"It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total
collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11.
Did we witness an unprecedented event three separate
times on September 11, 2001? The NIST reports, which
attempted to support that unlikely conclusion, fail to per
suade a growing number of architects, engineers, and
scientists. Instead, the evidence points overwhelmingly
to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed
by controlled demolition. Given the far-reaching implications,
it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be
the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation
by responsible authorities."
Full paper:
https://www.europhysicsnews.org/arti...2016474p21.pdf
Bookmarks