Originally Posted by
Wake27
No disagreement. I have a 1-4 on my chrome lined gun and very badly want to put the Razor on it. My point was only that most people could probably do everything they need with something cheaper than the Khales or Swaro optics, and the Razor meets that criteria. Same concept as getting a BCM instead of a KAC. It’ll probably work just fine for the vast majority of people.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I believe in paying for quality when it comes to most things. Firearms and optics especially. Could most people get by with a cheaper option? Sure. But if you can afford top quality, I believe you should buy top quality. The difference in glass, edge distortion, etc when comparing low end, mid range, and high end optics is very significant. Should you stretch your monthly budget for necessities of life to afford a high end optic? No. If you have the disposable funds to buy top quality, the juice is definitely worth the squeeze.
Originally Posted by
Wake27
I’ll drop $2k and more on guns all day, but for some reason spending more than $600 on an optic really bothers me haha. I hate thinking how much I paid for just a T2.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ha, I hear you. I used to feel the same way. That was until I picked up a s&b 4-16 PMII for my 308 OBR. The glass ruined me - I cannot shoot cheap glass. Seeing a low end optic on a nice rifle has become one of my biggest pet peeves.
Last edited by JoshNC; 04-29-18 at 12:16.
SLG Defense 07/02 FFL/SOT
Bookmarks